calmobeagler wrote:Believe it or not why your standing there talking judges actually try to stay with the pack and see what dog is doing what.
As we say it. "We don't walk and talk. We run to catch." Catch the race. I'm not a tailgater. I tailgate at the football game.
We come to win and we bring the dogs to do it. They hunt and handle just fine, but we come to run'em and have fun. We don't get mad when we don't win. You can't win them all.
My running partner won hunting and handling in his first cast last weekend. His dog then won the trial in the 5 dog winners pack. I took a year and half old pup and took second in my cast with barly any running (6th overall and Best of Show). It was dry, running was poor, and it was a tough day. Some days are and I understand that completely.
I started this because I agree with the new trailer we took with us. He is a really good houndsman, with winning calaber dogs. He paid over $60 to come (Two dogs - reg., entry, and club membership, luckily we live close so not major travel costs) and he then went home shaking his head. He couldn't believe we wouldn't take the dogs that ran a rabbit in their cast over the dogs that didn't run a rabbit. He couldn't see how hunting and handling only could be considered as winning a rabbit dog sport.
calmobeagler wrote:Just curious what do you do when your judging!
I do the same thing as any good "bloody mess" judge does, but that's not the point.
The point is the weaknesses in the rules and setting a higher standard via said rules. A standard we can all be proud of.
If of 40 people 70% agree there needs to be a change to the hunting and handling rule, then we need to come up with a better solution than H&H. It doesn't have to be my suggestion. What do you think would be an improvement?