The American Beagler Magazine Takes on Anti-Hunters
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:54 am
I doubt that many of you missed this great pro-hunting news. What you may not know is that Bev's American Beagler Magazine filed excellent comments opposing this anti-dog hunting measure. Thanks, Bev!
Bob Kane
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Kane
To: Undisclosed Recipient List
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 9:00 PM
Subject: Hunters Win Milestone Victory!!
Dear Fellow Sportsmen,
Today was a milestone in the fight to protect hunters' rights. The California Assembly Committee on Water, Parks and Wildlife voted 10-4 to reject Assemblyman Paul Koretz's (D-42) AB 342. This legislation would have banned all mammal hunting with dogs. Shortly before the vote, in an effort to mute opposition to the original bill, its author revised the language so it applied only bears and bobcats, dropping rabbits, fox, raccoons, et al.
Another anti-hunting bill, Assemblyman Joe Nation's (D-6) AB 1190, banning all dove hunting in the state, was scheduled to be heard by the same committee today. Nation pulled his bill last week, in the face of heavy hunter opposition.
Normally, the Humane Society of the U.S. (HSUS) and its animal rightist (AR) anti-hunting allies confine themselves to attacking hunting's fringe areas, such as blocking new or expanded seasons. Very rarely have they attacked hunters so directly, attempting to ban existing hunting through legislation. Wayne Pacelle, HSUS senior vice president and one of the AR bill sponsors, personally testified in Sacramento, reaffirming his underlying strategy "... We will take it species by species until all hunting is stopped in California. Then we will take it state by state." (Interviewed for Full Cry, "America's leading tree hound publication," October 1990)
It was critical that both of these efforts be defeated. The Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance (SAOVA) and virtually every national sportsman’s advocacy group were deeply committed to that task. The breadth of opposition was nothing short of amazing. Every sportsmen group in California was involved, waterfowlers, bird hunters, houndsmen, big game hunters, shooters, anglers, supported by farmers, dog registries and others. I saw activity from 150 San Francisco area dachshund owners, as well as from many dog owner groups and hunt clubs throughout the country. Our opposition communications outnumbered those from animal rightists by 40:1. If sportsmen can defeat such legislation in California, they can do it anywhere!
This just wasn't a California hunters' fight or victory. Yes, the entire national sportsmen's lobby from the NRA to CWA to tiny SAOVA was involved, but we also had others' support.
From farmers
California Cattlemen's Association
California Wool Growers Association
California Farm Bureau Federation
Fresno County Farm Bureau
Labor Unions
Contra Costa Building and Construction Trades Council
Ironworkers Local 155
Four Dog Registries, non-traditional hunting dog groups, a dog food company, several animal owner advocacy groups
Sportsmen Groups from
Connecticut
Indiana
Kentucky
Maine
Michigan
New York
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Tennessee
Texas
Virginia to name a partial list.
Over 4300 comments were filed opposing AB 342, totally overwhelming the system. I'm so certain of this because my own comment is missing from the committee's tabulation, along with those of four more organizations that sent me copies of theirs.
Ours was a total victory. April 8, 2003 was special day for hunting sportsmen, not only in California, but across America. The unity of purpose and perseverance demonstrated in defeating these two animal rightist bills mark a turning point. No longer will outdoorsmen be apathetic and uninvolved when their sport is threatened.
Thank you for your support and understanding.
Bob Kane
Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance
http://saova.org
Forwarding and cross posting encouraged
Bob Kane
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Kane
To: Undisclosed Recipient List
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 9:00 PM
Subject: Hunters Win Milestone Victory!!
Dear Fellow Sportsmen,
Today was a milestone in the fight to protect hunters' rights. The California Assembly Committee on Water, Parks and Wildlife voted 10-4 to reject Assemblyman Paul Koretz's (D-42) AB 342. This legislation would have banned all mammal hunting with dogs. Shortly before the vote, in an effort to mute opposition to the original bill, its author revised the language so it applied only bears and bobcats, dropping rabbits, fox, raccoons, et al.
Another anti-hunting bill, Assemblyman Joe Nation's (D-6) AB 1190, banning all dove hunting in the state, was scheduled to be heard by the same committee today. Nation pulled his bill last week, in the face of heavy hunter opposition.
Normally, the Humane Society of the U.S. (HSUS) and its animal rightist (AR) anti-hunting allies confine themselves to attacking hunting's fringe areas, such as blocking new or expanded seasons. Very rarely have they attacked hunters so directly, attempting to ban existing hunting through legislation. Wayne Pacelle, HSUS senior vice president and one of the AR bill sponsors, personally testified in Sacramento, reaffirming his underlying strategy "... We will take it species by species until all hunting is stopped in California. Then we will take it state by state." (Interviewed for Full Cry, "America's leading tree hound publication," October 1990)
It was critical that both of these efforts be defeated. The Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance (SAOVA) and virtually every national sportsman’s advocacy group were deeply committed to that task. The breadth of opposition was nothing short of amazing. Every sportsmen group in California was involved, waterfowlers, bird hunters, houndsmen, big game hunters, shooters, anglers, supported by farmers, dog registries and others. I saw activity from 150 San Francisco area dachshund owners, as well as from many dog owner groups and hunt clubs throughout the country. Our opposition communications outnumbered those from animal rightists by 40:1. If sportsmen can defeat such legislation in California, they can do it anywhere!
This just wasn't a California hunters' fight or victory. Yes, the entire national sportsmen's lobby from the NRA to CWA to tiny SAOVA was involved, but we also had others' support.
From farmers
California Cattlemen's Association
California Wool Growers Association
California Farm Bureau Federation
Fresno County Farm Bureau
Labor Unions
Contra Costa Building and Construction Trades Council
Ironworkers Local 155
Four Dog Registries, non-traditional hunting dog groups, a dog food company, several animal owner advocacy groups
Sportsmen Groups from
Connecticut
Indiana
Kentucky
Maine
Michigan
New York
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Tennessee
Texas
Virginia to name a partial list.
Over 4300 comments were filed opposing AB 342, totally overwhelming the system. I'm so certain of this because my own comment is missing from the committee's tabulation, along with those of four more organizations that sent me copies of theirs.
Ours was a total victory. April 8, 2003 was special day for hunting sportsmen, not only in California, but across America. The unity of purpose and perseverance demonstrated in defeating these two animal rightist bills mark a turning point. No longer will outdoorsmen be apathetic and uninvolved when their sport is threatened.
Thank you for your support and understanding.
Bob Kane
Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance
http://saova.org
Forwarding and cross posting encouraged