TC wrote:Has anyone heard whether this has passed or failed?
Feed back would be great if we could hear how this turned out.
Dear SAOVA Friends,
On December 20, 2006, after 13 months of consideration and much heated debate, the Louisville Metropolitan Council passed 100 pages of revised dog ordinances. While the effort was undertaken following the fatal maulings of a child and an elderly man and was generally expected to include pit bull and other breed restrictions in the City, the adopted ordinances contained no limitations on dog breeds. Instead, literally at the 11th hour, the ordinance was rewritten to drop BSL and includes mandatory microchipping and $50 annual fees for *ALL* intact animals, rather than a proposed $100 intact pit bull fee. Altered dog license costs will remain at $9.
In addition, the new law includes the following additional provisions:
Pet limits--3 dogs on up to .5 acre; 7 dogs on up to 2 acres and no limit on tracts greater than 2 acres.
New tethering restrictions
Revaccination/relicensing requirement for all dogs/cats removed from a kennel or cattery.
Breeder licensing.
Prohibits use of invisible fencing for unaltered dogs.
Requires 6 foot fence with one foot underground, 4 foot leash, and microchip for unaltered dogs.
Mandates spay/neuter for any unaltered dog that is impounded for any reason before the owner can reclaim the dog.
Requires vets to report rabies vaccination information to Metro Animal Services (MAS) so that dogs which got a rabies vax but not a license can be impounded.
Allows dogs to be impounded for "irritating" or "perturbing" ANYONE.
Prohibits ownership of ANY animals by anyone who has two violations within 5 years-no matter how minor.
Requires reporting of all litters, including brief description of all puppies.
Requires reporting of all sales of all dogs, with buyers name & address to be sent to MAS, even if buyer is not local.
Requires dog license # to be published in paper in any sale advertisement.
In order to enforce this series of expensive and very intrusive regulations, the city of Louisville requires local veterinarians supply dog owner - dog information to identify intact dogs receiving rabies vaccinations. Vets outside the city's limits will undoubtedly see increased business as people avoid this "gotcha" database. Florida and Texas Veterinary Medical Associations blocked such statewide data collections in their states in past. Unfortunately, in 2006, the Virginia Veterinary Medical Association and certain dog owners supported this statewide pet owner information reporting law.
Pennsylvania has proposed extensive new rules for that state's dog breeders. These appear to closely mimic the Pet Animal Welfare Statute of 2005 (PAWS) in their design and potential scope. Ohio also has a troublesome dog statute pending, while California localities continue their assaults on pet ownership and Virginia animal rightists' agenda grows. These assaults will only intensify in 2007. SAOVA's website has been updated to reflect the 2006 election outcomes
http://saova.org/results.html and a new SAOVA News and Updates page added
http://saova.org/news.html
As you prepare your Holiday gift list, please consider supporting SAOVA's pro-active animal owner advocacy via a website PayPal donation. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Bob Kane
Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance -
Working to identify and elect supportive legislators
http://saova.org