chapkosbeagles wrote:Mo
U talk about saporting gun control but the kids of Sandy Hill could of been killed by various different calibers of weapons,knifes,swoards ext. It was not the caliber or size of clip that did that .it was a druged up crazy kid.
If anything I thought the change people would bring is armed guards at each an ever school in america. This would also create jobs for layed off law enforcement extra.
But u being so educated my opeions probally dont make sence to u as I am just a dumb country boy
Where exactly is the money going to come from? If you haven't noticed we are broke and there are literally tens of thousands of school districts in our country. That would cost billions!!! And since you conservatives say "not one more cent" as your motto.. who would you have pay for this?? And who wants to leave in a police state? You guys already complain about the TSA and extra security.. Is having your kids grow up in need of 24/7 armed protection what we need? We are better than that.
Ya, the kids could have been killed by anything but a lot less would have died if it were a knife or a bat...
Newt wrote:Mo. Beagler 5000 wrote:adirondackjoe wrote:b
ME TOO MAN!!! I did those things as well.... I go to church (well I need to find one at my new place) but I don't think we need to legislate marriage and that prayer has no business being taught in school. I am a mess I also think we should legalize pot but execute people in public for all violent rapes and murders.....
Maybe you should leave the POT alone for a few days before you give your philosophy. It would maybe make more sense.
nice quip newt- I have not smoked pot for 16 years or so.. Nor would I if it were legal.
Pine Lakes wrote:Mo. Beagler 5000 wrote:Pine Lakes wrote:
Not all automobile related deaths are accidents, but they are all needless deaths that can be "curbed" with more legislation, so why is the matter not of high priority? Is it ok for people to die of anything not natural? The tyrants are those like yourself who would strip american citizens of their rights granted by the Constitution. You sir are sickening, and I wouldn't dream of living anywhere else, I'll die here in this country fighting for what I believe to be right and true for all men. This argument has nothing to do with political affiliation, you are however a liberal. You are absolutely right that Rachel Maddow doesn't call for the people to rise up against the government, she instead calls for you to follow your government without question. The latter being more dangerous.
I find it funny that you would recomend that I live somewhere else, while you are the one that has no respect for the Constitution of this country. I retract the statement I made about you seemingly being intelligent, and I will go back to not posting on such matters because there is no reasoning with people like you. My life is a lot less stressful when I do so.
Have fun with less stress.. Yes, because I believe we should do something to stop innocent people being murder, I have no regard for the constitution... well put.
Have you noticed with automobiles we DO LEGISLATE THEM MORE EVERY YEAR.. EVERY SINGLE YEAR-- They have to more fuel efficient, more safe, more airbags, more sensors, more data collected, we change speed limits, we put up more lights or take some down, we are making vehicles that drive themselves, legislate drunk drivers, texting.... and the problem DECREASES-- IT GOES DOWN MAN.. So Ya, thinking about legislating guns can have a positive effect on gun deaths if done right...
God isn't real, Beer is good and people are crazy, there I fixed it.