January 24th, 2009 , a short column entitled "Replacing Michelle" in
the National Review "The Week" column. Here it is, word for word, as it appeared:
Some employees are simply irreplaceable. Take Michelle Obama: The University of Chicago Medical center hired her in 2002 to run "programs for community relations, neighborhood outreach, volunteer recruitment, staff diversity and minority contracting" .
In 2005 the hospital raised her salary from $120,000 to $317,000 - nearly
twice what her husband made as a Senator.
Oh did we mention that her husband had just become a US Senator? He sure had. Requested a $1 million earmark for the UC Medical Center, in fact. Way to network Michelle!
But now that Mrs. Obama has resigned, the hospital says her position will remain unfilled. How can that be, if the work she did was vital enough to be worth $317,000?
Let me add that Michelle's position was a part time, 20 hour a week job. And, to think they were critical of Blagoyovich' s wife for taking $100,000 in fuzzy real estate commission.
My thoughts: How did this bit of quid pro quo corruption escape the sharp reporters that dug through Sarah Palin's garbage and kindergarten files? Unbelievable!
Replacing Michelle
Moderators: Pike Ridge Beagles, Aaron Bartlett
-
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
- Location: Pineville Ky
Re: Replacing Michelle
SOUNDS LIKE THE CEO'S AT ALL THE BANKS AND WALL STREET COMPANIES OR MAYBE DICK CHANEY AND HALLIBURTON,HE SCAMED AMERICAN TAX PAYERS OUT OF MILLIONS.
If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered
Re: Replacing Michelle
Good Lord Rufus, cant you even SEE the corruption when its right there in black and white (no pun intended)??? You absolutely REFUSE to acknowledge that anyone other than REPUBLICANS could be guilty of ANYTHING can you??? Its getting truly sad for you Rufus...
Tony
Tony
The 1st amendment allows the usual liberal narcissistic "I think.." which is how they start all their sentences.
The second amendment protects us from implementing "I think"
The second amendment protects us from implementing "I think"