Obama: Spreading Love to America's Enemies

Share thoughts, news, views, etc. WARNING, this forum contains a lot of heated political debate. Harsh profanity is not allowed, but if you are easily offended, do not visit this forum.

Moderators: Pike Ridge Beagles, Aaron Bartlett

Post Reply
Newt
Posts: 5358
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:42 am

Obama: Spreading Love to America's Enemies

Post by Newt »

The new friends of Obama, Iran and Cuba, sure respect him.


The Havana Tribune, a state-controlled Cuban newspaper, has added insult to injury following Fidel Castro’s scathing criticism of President Barack Obama upon his departure from the island. In an editorial, the title of which refers to President Obama as “negro,” an opinion columnist has accused him of “inciting rebellion.”

The article is titled “Negro, ¿Tu Eres Sueco?” which roughly translates to “Black Man, Are You Dumb?” (The idiom “pretend to be a Swede” means to play dumb, hence the title is literally asking, “Are you Swedish?”) The author, who is black, goes on to condemn President Obama for meeting with Cuban pro-democracy activists and “subtly” suggesting that the Cuban Revolution needed to change. “Obama came, saw, but unfortunately, with the pretend gesture of lending a hand, tried to conquer,” Elias Argudín writes.

“[Obama] chose to criticize and subtly suggest … incitations to rebellion and disorder, without caring that he was on foreign ground. Without a doubt, Obama overplayed his hand,” he continues. “The least I can say is, Virulo-style: ‘Negro, are you dumb?'”

Virulo is a white pro-Revolution comedian.

Argudín’s article later accuses President Obama of presiding over a racist country–mocking the calls for freedom in Cuba by stating, “Which freedom–the freedom enjoyed by white police to massacre and manhandle black people?”–and issue demands parroted straight from the Castro regime: the end of the “genocidal” embargo and giving the Guantánamo Bay Naval Base, which has belonged to the United States since before Cuban independence, to the Castros.

quote:
“Black Man, Are You Dumb?”



In this particular case, the answer is a resounding 'yes'. Funny thing. Remember when candidate Obama told us that he would be able to talk to our enemies, reason with them, and the world situation would be so much better as a result?

Some of us knew that was crap when he said it. But after Bergdahl, Iran, and now Cuba, what does our idiot have to show in return for totally capitulating to our enemies?

Outside of making America a laughing stock, the answer is.....nothing.
Last edited by Newt on Fri Apr 01, 2016 7:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

Pine Mt Beagles
Posts: 7803
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Pineville Ky

Re: Obama: Spreading Love to America's Enemies

Post by Pine Mt Beagles »

Try to read,,
Maybe you will find something you have heard before,

Below is a Partial list of reasons ,,,why ,,That President Barack Obama,,,is now,,,Rated The Number -1- President in Modern times,though some ,still have him rated as ,the 10 th best President, of ,all they will come around, if America is Cursed ,with another Republican ,


Obama’s Foreign Policy Successes
BY NOV 10, 2011 1:11 PM
Obama’s Foreign Policy Successes
BY NOV 10, 2011 1:11 PM

First Remember that President Obama ,has been Responsable for taking more Terrorist off the Battle Field than any President,,and ,,has recaptured most of the 500 plus that Bush / Cheney turned out of Gitmo.

And Remember this President had Exported more Illegals back to Mexaco than all other Presidents combined.2.4 Million.

KILLED OSAMA BIN LADEN, RAMPED UP CAMPAIGN AGAINST AL QAEDA

Obama’s policy: Soon after taking office, President Obama ordered then-CIA director Leon Panetta to “redouble” efforts to track down al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. Just six months after 9/11, President Bush said of bin Laden, “I really just don’t spend much time on” bin Laden. In 2005, Bush shut down the CIA’s unit dedicated to tracking him because resources were needed to fight the war in Iraq. Nearly three years later, Obama ordered a Navy SEAL raid into bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, killing the al-Qaeda leader and obtaining troves of valuable intelligence on the terror network. Then-Secretary of Defense Robert Gates calledPresident Obama’s decision to get bin Laden “one of the most courageous calls I’ve ever seen a president make.”

GOP’s response: The GOP refused to credit the Obama administration with planning and executing the raid and baselessly claimed the Bush administration’s torture program led to the killing of Bin Laden.

Outcome: Bin Laden’s death brought an end to a nearly decade long manhunt. No civilians or U.S. military personnel were killed. Indeed, as CAP’s Brian Katulis and Peter Juul note, “the Al Qaeda network over the past three years suffered its greatest losses since the United States and its allies evicted the terrorist organization from Afghanistan in 2001.”
MOBILIZED INT’L COALITION TO PROTECT LIBYAN PRO-DEMOCRACY DEMONSTRATORS

Obama’s policy: The Obama administration, led by Susan Rice at the United Nations, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at NATO, pulled together an international coalition to approve and successfully execute a no-fly zone over Libya to protect anti-Qaddafi rebels.

GOP’s response: Republicans parroted Qaddafi’s propaganda claiming that Al Qaeda was behind the rebel uprising. With Qaddafi’s death, Republicans again refused to credit Obama, mocked the White House for “leading from behind” and criticized the administration’s strategy for failing to use more U.S. air-power or putting American “boots on the ground.”
Outcome: In just seven months and spending only $1 billion, coalition forces helped the rebels successfully overthrow the Qaddafi regime on october 20, 2011.
ORDERED THE COMPLETE WITHDRAWAL OF U.S. FORCES FROM IRAQ BY END OF THE YEAR

Obama’s policy: Early in his presidency, Obama promised that U.S. troops would end combat missions by late summer 2010. Combat missions formally ended on August 31, 2010. On October 21, 2011, following Iraqi parliament’s unwillingness to support an extension of immunity for U.S. military personnel, Obama announced that all U.S. troops will be out of Iraq by the end of the year.

GOP’s response: Despite the fact President Bush signed an agreement to withdraw all U.S. troop from Iraq by 2012, Republicans called the decision an “astonishing failure” and claimed Obama “lost the war in Iraq.” Despite once hailing the agreement signed by the Bush administration outlining the process of U.S. troop withdrawal, Fred Kagan charged that “this retreat will have great costs for the United States.”

Outcome: The withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq brings an end to a costly and war, in both lives and treasure. The troop withdrawal will lower total U.S. government costs for operations in Iraq to $11 billion in 2012. A massive reduction from the $65.1 billion budgeted for Iraq in 2010.
ISOLATED AND WEAKENED IRAN

Obama’s policy: The Obama administration has worked to tighten and enforce sanctions against Iran and on June 9, 2010, the U.N. Security Council, at the Obama administration’s encouragement, passed a new round of multilateral sanctions. The following month, Obama signed the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 (CISADA) which, among other restrictions, banned Iranian-origin imports for items such as rugs, pistachios and caviar.

GOP’s response: The right wing continues to criticize Obama for failing to bring “crippling” — Iraq-style — sanctions against Iran or for not explicitly threatening military action. For example, while ignoring signs of progress in Obama’s pressure and containment strategy against Tehran, Mitt Romney inaccurately claimedthat “our president has communicated in various subtle ways that there is not a military option that we would consider.”

Outcome: The IAEA reported recently that Iran is increasingly moving toward a weaponized program. But outside pressure has stalled and/or delayed progress. The Iranians have had difficulty in acquiring replacement parts for machines used to enrich uranium and damage from the Stuxnet computer virus — understood to have been developed as part of U.S. government program — led to a slowdown in program. Obama’s push on Iran at the United Nations has isolated the Islamic Republic internationally and the administration’s diplomats persuaded Russia and China to abstain from vetoing U.N. sanctions.
REPEALED DON’T ASK, DON’T TELL

Obama’s policy: Fulfilling his campaign promise to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Obama, along with Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Michael Mullen, formally certified the repeal of the law on July 22, 2011.

GOP’s response: Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA), who orchestrated legislative maneuvers to delay the repeal, said that the “homosexual lobby” is pushing for “a military takeover by the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender community.” Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-MN) said, “I would reinstate the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy.” None of the GOP presidential contenders immediately condemned the audience’s booing of a gay soldier during an Orlando GOP debate.
Outcome: As of September 20, 2011, gay and lesbians can serve openly in the U.S. military.
HALVED THE NUMBER OF RUSSIAN AND AMERICAN NUCLEAR MISSILE LAUNCHERS

Obama’s policy: Obama signed the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) with Russia as part of his push to reduce the emphasis on nuclear weapons in the U.S. and Russia’s deterrence strategies. In the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), the administration sought to limit the role of the U.S.’s nuclear deterrent by declaring the U.S. will not use or threaten the use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states that are party to the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

GOP’s response: Republicans, led by Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ), were outspoken about their opposition to New START, a treaty that even Henry Kissinger described as “modest.” House Republicans used procedural challenges to slow the ratification of New START and Mitt Romney inaccuratelyattacked the treaty for “imped[ing] missile defense, [sic] our protection from nuclear-proliferation rogue states such as Iran and North Korea.”

Outcome: Outside right-wing organizations like the Heritage Foundation opposing the treaty, the Senate consented to its ratification and Obama signed New START, completing the ratification process, on February 2, 2011. The treaty requires that both Russia and the U.S. reduce their nuclear warhead arsenals to 1,550 each, a 30 percent reduction from the 2002 Treaty of Moscow and a 74 percent reduction from the 1991 START treaty.
SUPPORTED DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION IN EGYPT

Obama’s policy: The Obama administration consistently called for Egyptian authorities to respect the rights of protesters during demonstrations against the Mubarak regime and helped negotiate a non-violent end to his decades-long rule. The administration also worked with Egyptian counterparts to set out the steps for an orderly transition of power and praised the military for showing restraint in responding to protests.

GOP’s response: Republicans said Obama thew “Mubarak under the bus” and warned that the pro-democracy movement was a “virus spreadingthroughout the Middle East.” Sen. Orin Hatch (R-UT) told reporters “I know President Mubarak personally, he’s been a friend of America. I feel sad that he’s going through this.”

Outcome: Mubarak resigned on February 11 and the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces took control of the government. The Council indicated that it intended to suspend emergency laws that have been in effect for three decades and facilitate a transition to democracy. The Council maintains good relationships with the Obama administration and has declared that Egypt “is committed to all regional and international obligations and treaties.” Presidential elections are scheduled for March or April 2012 and a series of parliamentary elections will be held from November 2011 to January 2012.
KILLED SENIOR AL QAEDA LEADER ANWAR AL AWLAKI

Obama’s policy: President Obama ordered a drone attack that killedal Qaeda propagandist Anwar Al Awlaki, a U.S.-Yemeni dual citizen.
GOP’s response: Republicans inaccurately claimed that “enhanced interrogations” and intelligence gleaned from detainees at Guantanamo Bay were used in the operation and, downplaying the significance of Awlaki’s death, endorsed Yemeni strongman Ali Abdullah Saleh as “preferable to Al-Qaeda.”
Outcome: Al Awlaki’s death brought a damaging blow to Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and removed one of Al Qaeda’s most powerful voices in spreading propaganda and recruiting foreign fighters. While there are legitimate questions surrounding the use of force in this case, the killing of al Awlaki and bin Laden undoubtedly weakens Al Qaeda’s ability to operate in the Middle East and plan and execute attacks.
STRENGTHENED U.S.-ISRAEL RELATIONSHIP

Obama’s Policy: Strengthen America’s military and intelligence relationship with Israel. In an interview in August, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said, “I can hardly remember a better period of support, American support and cooperation and similar strategic understanding of events around us than what we have right now.” According to one Israeli official, that coordination is now “even better than under President Bush.”

The GOP’s Response: Republicans and the right wing routinely say that Obama is anti-Israel and has thrown Israel “under the bus.”
Outcome: While there has been tension between the U.S. and Israel, over the settlement issue, this should not obscure the otherwise overwhelming support that President Obama has given Israel.
The Wall Street Journal reported that, under Obama, “U.S. military aid to Israel has increased markedly,” an effort that stems from policy directives the White House gave the Pentagon early in Obama’s presidency to “deepen and expand the quantity and intensity of cooperation to the fullest extent.” Importantly, Obama has increased the level of strategic dialogue and the depth of intelligence coordination between the U.S. and Israel, particularly regarding Iran, a key Israeli security concern. President Obama’s efforts to increase US-Israel cooperation have resulted in the significant slowing of Iran’s nuclear progress.

If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered

Rabbithoundjb
Posts: 4517
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Rocky Mount, NC

Re: Obama: Spreading Love to America's Enemies

Post by Rabbithoundjb »

LMAO! YOU HAVE TO BE A COMPLETE MORON TO EVEN COPY SUCH LEFTIST PROPAGANDA, IN YOUR CASE PMB THAT ABSOLUTELY APPLIES, LMAO!


MAN YOU JUST CAN'T FIX STUPID.

cris axtell/coal hill ken
Posts: 1275
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 9:58 pm
Location: greenville pa NW

Re: Obama: Spreading Love to America's Enemies

Post by cris axtell/coal hill ken »

If Obama did all that then I invented the internet.
COAL HILL KENNELS. LP GR CH Coal Hill's Brush Buster. 2014 PA state champion LP GR CH Coal Hill's Mama Cass. 2010 PA state champion LP R CH GR BCH Coal Hill's Princess Willow HOG DOG POWER!!!!

bluemouse
Posts: 2533
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:35 am
Location: low country sc

Re: Obama: Spreading Love to America's Enemies

Post by bluemouse »

" by Nov 10,2011" really clown. I see your following in your hero's tracks of being a slacker. Neither of you two clowns have any independent original thought what so ever. Keep us laughing clown!

Newt
Posts: 5358
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:42 am

Re: Obama: Spreading Love to America's Enemies

Post by Newt »

PM, I didn't need to read your post. Everyone with a brain knows Obama is the most popular President in Iran, Cuba, Venezuela and probably Russia and China as well. Since that is about half the worlds population, you and Big Mike tipped the scales in his favor. Congratulations! :lol:

Pine Mt Beagles
Posts: 7803
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Pineville Ky

Re: Obama: Spreading Love to America's Enemies

Post by Pine Mt Beagles »

Republican ,,Cursed ,,Reprobates,,

Every single one of you ,know ,these are the Facts ,but,your,Racist. Bigotry. Has you blinded it's no wonder God Cursed America,Republicans live here.
As long as there are Republicans,,America will never prosper and the World will never have peace .Every time Democrats gets America going in the right direction ,Republicans ,,buy another election or get the Supremist Court to appoint one.

If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered

Pine Lakes
Posts: 1311
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 6:26 pm

Re: Obama: Spreading Love to America's Enemies

Post by Pine Lakes »

Pine Mt Beagles wrote:Republican ,,Cursed ,,Reprobates,,

Every single one of you ,know ,these are the Facts ,but,your,Racist. Bigotry. Has you blinded it's no wonder God Cursed America,Republicans live here.
As long as there are Republicans,,America will never prosper and the World will never have peace .Every time Democrats gets America going in the right direction ,Republicans ,,buy another election or get the Supremist Court to appoint one.
If the Dems didn't buy votes with social welfare programs they wouldn't win a single election. Democrats have never "got this country going in the right direction". They are dingleberries that won't fall off. You are a great example.

Post Reply