OBAMA 'I'm not trying to kill Grandma"

Share thoughts, news, views, etc. WARNING, this forum contains a lot of heated political debate. Harsh profanity is not allowed, but if you are easily offended, do not visit this forum.

Moderators: Pike Ridge Beagles, Aaron Bartlett

Pine Mt Beagles
Posts: 7803
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Pineville Ky

Re: OBAMA 'I'm not trying to kill Grandma"

Post by Pine Mt Beagles »

I'AM SORRY BUT REPUBLICAN'S DON'T SUPPORT ANYTHING,OR STAND FOR ANYTHING ,OR BELIEVE IN ANYTHING-AND WILL SAY ANY THING -EXCEPT THE TRUTH--AND AMERICA HAS FINALLY SAW THROUGH THEIR BULL AND DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING THEY SAY. THEY HAVE LIED SO MUCH THEY ARE SIMPLY NOT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY,, ONLY THE FEW, THAT ARE LIVING IN THE PAST DECADE'S EVEN LISTEN TO ANY OF THEM..THEY HAVE TWO CHOICES- EVOLVE FROM THEIR PRE-CIVIL WAR MIND SET-OR GET LEFT BEHIND-IT'S A SIMPLE CONCEPT..I THINK WE HAD A GOVERNMENT EVEN THEN, OF SOME KIND--BUT IT WAS NOT REPUBLICAN--

If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered

Rabbithoundjb
Posts: 4517
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Rocky Mount, NC

Re: OBAMA 'I'm not trying to kill Grandma"

Post by Rabbithoundjb »

MORE PMB REPUBLICAN THIS, REPUBLICAN THAT. A CLEAR AND LONG DEAD ATTEMPT TO AVOID TALKING ABOUT THIS ADMINISTRATIONS LIES, FAILURES AND SO ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AND AS FOR CLINTON, YES HE CREATED 23 MILLION JOBS. HE ALSO SIGNED INTO LAW LEGISLATION THAT HAS SENT SEVERAL MORE THAN THAT OUT OF THE COUNTRY. (NAFTA) AGAIN YOU AVOID THE MORE CRITICAL FACTS!!!

Pine Mt Beagles
Posts: 7803
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Pineville Ky

Re: OBAMA 'I'm not trying to kill Grandma"

Post by Pine Mt Beagles »

During the April 11 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, host Bill O'Reilly(((A SELF PROCLAIMED TERRORIST))) falsely claimed that "most Republicans didn't want" the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which was signed by the United States, Mexico, and Canada. In fact, in both the House and the Senate, congressional Republicans voted overwhelmingly in favor of the agreement: In the House, 132 Republicans voted in favor and 43 opposed, and in the Senate, 34 Republicans voted in favor and 10 against. O'Reilly's guest, New York City Councilman Charles Barron (D), noted that Democrats and Republicans supported the legislation. Democrats in the Senate voted against NAFTA (with 28 opposed and 27 in favor), as they did in the House (with 156 opposed and 102 in favor).
=
=IS CANADA OR MEXICO OVER SEA'S =AND WHAT PART OF OVERWHELMINGLY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND IT'S CALLED=== BI- PARTISIAN=====THIS WAS BACK WHEN REPUBLICAN'S WERE INTERESTED IN THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered

Rabbithoundjb
Posts: 4517
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Rocky Mount, NC

Re: OBAMA 'I'm not trying to kill Grandma"

Post by Rabbithoundjb »

WHAT PART OF BILL CLINTON SIGNED INTO LAW LEGISLATION THAT HAS COSTS MILLIONS OF AMERICANS THEIR JOBS DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WHY DO YOU HIDE YOURSELF WHEN YOUR ON THE SITE, OH JUST LIKE THE DEMOCRATS YOU DON'T LIKE TRANSPARENTCY.

User avatar
Bev
Site Admin
Posts: 4406
Joined: Sun May 19, 2002 12:18 pm
Location: Indpls., IN
Contact:

Re: OBAMA 'I'm not trying to kill Grandma"

Post by Bev »

THEY HAVE TWO CHOICES- EVOLVE FROM THEIR PRE-CIVIL WAR MIND SET-OR GET LEFT BEHIND-IT'S A SIMPLE CONCEPT..I THINK WE HAD A GOVERNMENT EVEN THEN, OF SOME KIND--BUT IT WAS NOT REPUBLICAN--
Rufus, I want you to read these paragraphs very carefully. They are from the National Black Republican Association. They aren't views or opinions, they are FACT. The Democratic party has always been the enemy of black Americans, and it was the REPUBLICAN PARTY who made every attempt to end the abuse and injustice on a people who literally worked beside us to build this nation:

The Democratic Party Owes Blacks An Apology

As author Michael Scheuer stated, the Democratic Party is the party of the four S's: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism. Clearly, then, it is the Democratic Party that owes black Americans an apology – not the Republican Party, nor the United States of America.

The time is long overdue for the Democratic Party to apologize for that party’s 150-year history of racism and cease hiding behind the curtain of Congress, issuing unwarranted apologies on behalf of America, while simultaneously using racial politics for partisan political gain. Only then can we finally end the racial divisiveness that has torn our nation asunder.

National Democratic Party leaders should follow the example set by the Democratic Party leaders in North Carolina, who, as a result of the 1898 Wilmington Race Riot Commission Report of May 31, 2006, issued a unanimous apology on January 20, 2007 for the Democratic Party's 1898 murderous rampage where dozens of black Americans were massacred. That apology can be viewed on the Internet at: http://www.ncdp.org/node/1546.

In a letter to the North Carolina Democratic Party, North Carolina Lieutenant Governor Richard H. Moore wrote: “We can no longer ignore the fact that many of us grew up being taught a much sanitized – and inaccurate – history…. The truth is ugly.”

The ugly racist history of the Democratic Party prompted Wayne Perryman to write his book "Unfounded Loyalty: An In-depth Look Into The Love Affair Between Blacks and Democrats". Perryman then filed a lawsuit against the Democratic Party on December 10, 2004 – that went all the way to the US Supreme Court – demanding an apology on behalf of black Americans. However, after admitting their history of racism under oath in court, the Democrats refused to apologize and, with an army of lawyers, used the legal technicality of “standing” to avoid a court order against them, knowing they can take the black vote for granted.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Slavery: Democrats Fought to Expand It – Republicans Fought to End It

Etched in history is the fact that the Democratic Party, through its racist agenda and "States' Rights" claim to own slaves, sought to protect and preserve the institution of slavery from 1792 to 1865, thus keeping enslaved millions of blacks. The Republican Party was started in 1854 as the anti-slavery party, fought to free blacks from slavery and championed civil rights for blacks.

The Democratic Party enacted fugitive slave laws to keep blacks from escaping from plantations; instigated the 1856 “Dred Scott v. Standford” decision which legally classified blacks as property; passed the Missouri Compromise to spread slavery into 50% of the new Northern states; and passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act designed to spread slavery into all of the new states.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The Civil War: Democrats Seceded From The Union to Preserve Slavery

In the South, the Democratic Party formed the Confederacy, seceded from the Union and fought a Civil War (1861 to 1865) to expand slavery. Over 600,000 citizens were killed during that Civil War, including many thousand blacks.

Starting in 1861, anti-Civil War Democrats in the North were called "copperheads" like the poisonous snake. The ‘copperheads” wanted to appease the South and accept a negotiated peace, thereby, creating an independent Confederacy where blacks were kept in slavery. They also showed their deep opposition to the Civil War military conscription by verbally attacking Republican President Abraham Lincoln and taking their anger out on blacks, murdering and maiming blacks in virtually every Northern state.

Anti-Civil War Democrats in New York engaged in "Four Days of Terror" against the city's black population from July 13th to 16th in 1863, and the anti-Civil War chant of the Democrats, as reported by one Pennsylvania newspaper, was: "Willing to fight for Uncle Sam, but not for Uncle Sambo".

During the Civil War, President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863 which ordered the freeing of slaves in states that were rebelling against Union forces. Republicans passed the Thirteenth Amendment on January 31, 1865 that was ratified on December 6, 1865 to abolish all slavery in the United States.

In the book “The Political Lincoln: An Encyclopedia” Professors Paul Finkleman and Martin J. Hershock debunk the absurd myth that President Lincoln was somehow a “racist” because of his measured approach to ending slavery in the rebelling South first, while waging a war to end all slavery throughout the nation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Segregation: Democrats Opposed Civil Rights – Republicans Championed Civil Rights

The racial divisiveness prevalent today would not exist if the Democrats in control of the Southern states had left African Americans alone at the moment in history when blacks were freed from slavery and began “Juneteeth” celebrations to commemorate their emancipation. Instead Democrats set for themselves the horrendous task of keeping blacks in virtual slavery.

Southern Democrats passed discriminatory Black Codes in 1865 to suppress, restrict, and deny blacks the same privileges as whites. The Codes forced blacks to serve as apprentices to their former slave masters. Democrats also prevented blacks from getting their promised “40 acres and a mule”.

In 1866, the Ku Klux Klan was started by Democrats to lynch and terrorize Republicans, black and white, and the Ku Klux Klan became the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party. Details about the Democratic Party and the Ku Klux Klan can be found in the book “A Short History of Reconstruction” by Dr. Eric Foner.

To counter the discriminatory and terrorizing actions by Democrats, Republicans passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Reconstruction Act of 1867 that was designed to establish a new government system in the Democrat-controlled South, one that was fair to blacks.

Further, the Fourteenth Amendment pushed by Republicans was ratified in 1868 that granted blacks citizenship. The Fifteenth Amendment also pushed by Republicans was ratified in 1870 that granted blacks the right to vote.

Undaunted, Democrats passed discriminatory Jim Crow Laws in 1875 to restrict the rights of blacks to use public facilities. In response, Republicans passed the Civil Rights Act of 1875 which prohibited racial discrimination in public facilities.

Notably, the Hayes-Tilden Compromise of 1877 was another attempt by Republicans to get the Democrats to stop the lynchings and respect the rights of blacks. Contrary to legend, President Rutherford Hayes did not remove the last federal troops from the South, but merely ordered federal troops surrounding the South Carolina and Louisiana statehouses to return to their barracks.

Shamefully, Democrats fought against anti-lynching laws, and when the Democrats regained control of Congress in 1892, they passed the Repeal Act of 1894 that overturned civil right laws enacted by Republicans. Further, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Democrats and issued a ruling in the case of “Plessy v. Ferguson” in 1896 that established the "separate but equal" doctrine. That opinion stated that it was not a violation of the Constitution to have separate facilities for blacks. It took Republicans nearly six decades to finally get the civil rights laws of the 1950’s and 1960’s passed over the objection of the Democrats.

To advance civil rights for blacks, Republicans started the NAACP on February 12, 1909, the 100th anniversary of the birth of Abraham Lincoln. The first black head of the NAACP was black Republican James Weldon Johnson who became general secretary in 1920 and wrote the lyrics to the song “Lift Every Voice and Sing”. Republicans also founded the HBCU’s (Historically Black Colleges and Universities) because Democrats were trying to prevent blacks from getting a good education.

Return to frequently asked questions
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Martin Luther King was a Republican is next. Go to this site and just look around and educate yourself.
http://www.nbra.info/FrequentlyAskedQue ... An_Apology

If you can't do that, then at least go to http://www.stopembarrassingyourself.com

Pine Mt Beagles
Posts: 7803
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Pineville Ky

Re: OBAMA 'I'm not trying to kill Grandma"

Post by Pine Mt Beagles »

BEV
THAT IS A GOOD POST AND I HAVE BEEN READING HOW THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WAS FORMED FOR A FEW MONTH'S NOW,THAT IS A NOT SO ACCURATE DISCRIPTION YES THE DEMOCRAT'S FOUHT TO KEEP THE SLAVE IN THE SOUTH,BUT WHEN YOU GO BACK AND READ THE REST OF THE STORY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY DURING THE, REBUILDING PERIOD, WAS ENTIRELY WHITE MEN,AND DICTATED TO BY THE CHURCHES, AS TO WHO COULD JOIN AND WHO COULD NOT,AS FOR THE SLAVERY PART DEMOCRAT'S HAD MORE TO DO WITH THAT THAN REPUBLICAN'S BUT LATER AFTER THE REPUBLICAN PARTY CAME TO BE A NATIONAL INFLUENE WHICH WAS NOT VERY BIG AT THE TIME THEY BECAME VERY DISCRIMINATORY AND ARE MUCH WORSE TODAY.
=
=IT WAS A GOOD POST AND I THINK YOU FOR IT, IN FACT I WAS JUST READING ABOUT THE REBUILDING PERIOD, WHEN I CAME BACK TO THE BOARD.I'AM READING NOW, ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY SPLITING AND THE THREE PART'S OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY A FEW YEARS AFTER THE CIVIL WAR..
=THANKS AGAIN
RUFUS

If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered

User avatar
TC
Posts: 3829
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 1:36 am
Location: Kentucky
Contact:

Re: OBAMA 'I'm not trying to kill Grandma"

Post by TC »

Like I said Bev
YOU CAINT ARGUE WITH A BRICK WALL or THE MENTALLY ILL :roll: :roll: :roll:
Or maybe thats a MENTALLY ILL BRICK WALL ;)

Got yer purple card yet Rufus???
From Field to Show and Show to Field the way it should be

User avatar
Tim H
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 8:32 am
Location: Fishers, IN

Re: OBAMA 'I'm not trying to kill Grandma"

Post by Tim H »

=TIM
=I'AM AN AMERICAN-UNLIIKE YOU - I REALLY DON'T LIKE BEING COMPARED TO A GREEDY CORPORATE SLAVE LIKE YOU- THAT IS-- AGAINST-- EVERY POOR OR ELDERLY PERSON IN AMERICA-YOU FIT IN WELL WITH BLUE GRASS AND THE REST OF THE RACIST TRASH CALLING THEM SELVES TEA BAGGER'S
=
=HAVE YOUR FUN -I STILL HAVE ONE VOTE HOW MANY DO YOU HAVE---!!!!!!!!!!!!!


RUFUS, IM AN IDAPENDANT LIKE YOU NOW, SO WHY ARE YOU CLAIMING IM UNAMARICAN----WE BOTH KNOW THAT THE ONLY UNAMARICANS ARE THE REPUKES!!!!!!! I DON'T BELIEVE IN COPORATE AMERACA GETTING ALL THERE GREEDY MONEY- IT SHOULD GO TO THE POOR AND ELDERLY-- JUST CUS THE COPORATES EARNED IT THEY THINK THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO KEEP IT!!! THE REPUKES WANT TO JUST DO NOTHING ABOUT THAT---US INDAPENDANTS NEED TO STICK TOGETHER AND HELP OBAMA (MESSIAH) GIVE THAT MONEY BACK TO IT'S RIGHTFUL OWNERS--THE POOR AND ELDERLY!!! OBAMA, REID, PELOSI, DODD, FRANKS ARE ALL THE TYPE WHO HAVE MADE THIS COUNTRY GRATE!!! THERE IDIPENDANTS JUST LIKE US AND WE ARE GOING TO NOT JUST SAVE THIS COUNTRY BUT SAVE THE WORLD!!!

BY THE WAY, WHEN YOU GET A CHANCE COULD YOU SEND ME THE LINKS TO ALL YOUR INDEPENDANT BLOGS AND WEBSITES. IM NEW TO THIS INDIPENDANT THING AND NEED TO FIND SOME THINGS TO CUT AND PASTE SO AS I DON'T POST SOMETHING IM NOT SUPPOSED TO IN ORDER TO CONTINUE BEING INDIPENDANT. YOU KNOW HOW THESE REPUKES WILL TRY TO PIGEON HOLE ME AS A LIBERAL EVEN THOUGH IM INDEPENDANT!!!
"Watch your dog and SHUT-UP"

bluemouse
Posts: 2533
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:35 am
Location: low country sc

Re: OBAMA 'I'm not trying to kill Grandma"

Post by bluemouse »

Thats funy dun,t kare whous yer or. Thanks Tim

User avatar
Bev
Site Admin
Posts: 4406
Joined: Sun May 19, 2002 12:18 pm
Location: Indpls., IN
Contact:

Re: OBAMA 'I'm not trying to kill Grandma"

Post by Bev »

RO===TF=LMoA!!!! === ==

Newt
Posts: 5358
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:42 am

Re: OBAMA 'I'm not trying to kill Grandma"

Post by Newt »

Rufus, you should be careful with your nonsense. I'm confident HS monitors these boards. Don't be surprised if someone visits you in a white coat and presents you with a purple card already signed with your signature. Your best hope is that Obama supporters will be exempt from purple cards until after the 2012 election.

User avatar
TC
Posts: 3829
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 1:36 am
Location: Kentucky
Contact:

Re: OBAMA 'I'm not trying to kill Grandma"

Post by TC »

Newt wrote:Rufus, you should be careful with your nonsense. I'm confident HS monitors these boards. Don't be surprised if someone visits you in a white coat and presents you with a purple card already signed with your signature. Your best hope is that Obama supporters will be exempt from purple cards until after the 2012 election.
:haha: :haha: :haha: :haha: :haha: :haha:
From Field to Show and Show to Field the way it should be

Post Reply