Republican Nazi's

Share thoughts, news, views, etc. WARNING, this forum contains a lot of heated political debate. Harsh profanity is not allowed, but if you are easily offended, do not visit this forum.

Moderators: Pike Ridge Beagles, Aaron Bartlett

Post Reply
Pine Mt Beagles
Posts: 7803
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Pineville Ky

Republican Nazi's

Post by Pine Mt Beagles »

Remember,,I said republican's would vote for Hitler,,,and GUESS WHAT YOU DID !!!
The FAKE CHRISTIANS THE SO CALLED RELEGIOUS RIGHT PUT RUSSIA IN THE WHITE HOUSE,,KNOWING HOW RACIST AND BIGOTED REPUBLICANS ARE.
AND REPUBLICANS TRULY ARE GODS CURSE ON AMERICA. !!!

SCOTUS.
By MARK JOSEPH STERN
JAN 24, 20194:56 PM
Donald Trump with bare trees and a gray sky behind him.
President Donald Trump on the South Lawn of the White House on Saturday.

Mitch McConnell Is Spending the Shutdown Confirming More Trump Judges---More Nazi's

The Shutdown Shows Why America must turn from the Horror known as the republican party.

In 2014, the Supreme Court dramatically expanded the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to let for-profit corporations deny contraceptive coverage to employees on the basis of their owners’ Christian beliefs. The 5–4 ruling in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby prompted a now-famous dissent by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who condemned the court’s decision to use RFRA, a law originally intended to protect religious minorities, to legalize discrimination. “No tradition,” Ginsburg noted, “and no prior decision under RFRA, allows a religion-based exemption when the accommodation would be harmful to others.” Through Hobby Lobby, the court had transformed RFRA from a shield into a sword, creating a license to discriminate with no clear limitations.

On Wednesday, the Trump administration proved Ginsburg right. In a decision of startling breadth, the Department of Health and Human Services declared that, under RFRA, a federally funded foster care agency in South Carolina has a right to discriminate against non-Christians, closing its doors to would-be parents of different faiths. As Ginsburg predicted, the administration’s interpretation of the law has no limiting principle: It all but announced that taxpayer-funded adoption and foster care agencies may now engage in flagrant discrimination without consequence, so long as they state a religious rationale for their actions. The grim future that Ginsburg foresaw in Hobby Lobby has arrived.

The path of Wednesday’s decision began when Miracle Hill Ministries, a Christian foster care agency, refused to work with multiple applicants who did not share its beliefs. Miracle Hill turned away a Jewish woman eager to mentor children in foster care because she was not Christian. It also rejected same-sex couples because their sexual orientation did not align with its religious values. In response, the South Carolina Department of Social Services warned Miracle Hill that it could lose its license if it “intends to refuse to provide its services … to families who are not specifically Christians from a Protestant denomination.”

The grim future that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg foresaw in Hobby Lobby has arrived.
At that point, Republican Gov. Henry McMaster intervened, issuing an executive order granting adoption and foster care agencies the right to discriminate on the basis of religion. But a problem remained: A federal rule also prohibits HHS-funded agencies like Miracle Hill from engaging in discrimination on the basis of, among other things, religion and sexual orientation. So McMaster petitioned Steven Wagner, principal deputy assistant secretary at HHS’s Administration for Children and Families, to grant Miracle Hill an exemption. Wagner, a veteran of the George W. Bush administration’s “faith-based initiatives” program, promised McMaster’s staff that he was “pushing this hard” at HHS. And on Wednesday, Wagner granted the request in a four-page letter that amounts to an earthquake in federal civil rights law.

Wagner’s decision hinged on the turbocharged version of RFRA that the Supreme Court unleashed in Hobby Lobby. The law restricts the government’s ability to “substantially burden” a “person’s exercise of religion,” unless the government demonstrates that the burden is “the least restrictive means of furthering” a “compelling government interest.” Before Hobby Lobby, it is doubtful that a court would’ve recognized the “burden” imposed here—compelling a foster care agency to work with non-Christians—as “substantial.” After all, the federal rule merely directs Miracle Hill to serve all comers, not specifically perform services that violate the tenets of its faith. There is no clear encumbrance on “religious exercise,” only a requirement that the agency follow rules designed to place more children in loving homes without discriminating against anyone. Thus, RFRA should not apply at all.

In Hobby Lobby, however, the Supreme Court inflated the definition of a “substantial burden” to encompass more or less any religious objection an individual or corporation raises. The majority insisted that Obamacare’s contraceptive mandate constituted a “substantial burden” because it obliged companies to help finance insurance plans that included contraception coverage. If that attenuated connection is overly burdensome under RFRA, then what isn’t? Without any real explanation—but with Hobby Lobby lingering in the background—Wagner found that the federal rule barring religious discrimination among HHS-funded foster care agencies constitutes a “substantial burden” that is “inconsistent with RFRA.” And he concluded that the rule is not the “least restrictive means of advancing a compelling government interest,” obliging him to issue the waiver.

Wagner did not bother to evaluate the second half of that formula, whether nondiscrimination is a “compelling government interest.” Instead, he wrote that the federal rule is not the “least restrictive means” of promoting nondiscrimination because would-be parents rejected by Miracle Hill can go to a different agency. This logic is precisely what civil liberties advocates warned about after Hobby Lobby, when states like Indiana rushed to pass their own versions of RFRA. If religious businesses can claim a right to discriminate against customers because some other business might be willing to serve them, then America’s civil rights regime is fatally undermined. Yet Wagner deploys that exact logic to exempt Miracle Hill from the federal rule.

Notably, Wagner provides another reason for granting Miracle Hill an exemption: He notes that the current HHS nondiscrimination policy, implemented during the Obama administration, goes beyond the requirements laid out in a federal statute. The fact that the HHS rule spells out stronger protections than the statute, Wagner writes, is “relevant” to his “determination” that the policy violates RFRA.

This assertion is absurd. Wagner is correct that the HHS policy does not align perfectly with the federal statute it seeks to implement. That is unsurprising: Agencies routinely supplement the plain text of a law with reasonable interpretations of congressional intent; here, HHS simply sought to enforce Congress’ direction that children be placed in safe homes “in a timely manner” without arbitrary impediments. The agency’s broad interpretation does not permit Wagner to unilaterally overturn a rule that remains on the books, in full force. If the Trump administration would like to repeal this policy, it can do so through the rule-making process.


Wednesday’s decision purports to apply only to Miracle Hill, but its reasoning extends to every other foster and adoption agency that asserts a religious mission. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has already requested an exemption from the federal rule for all the state’s agencies; Wagner will presumably grant it. Once he does, other conservative states may begin to demand exemptions from the HHS policy, opening the floodgates to widespread discrimination. Non-Christian families and same-sex couples will be turned away from state-subsidized child welfare agencies because of their identity or religious beliefs—discrimination that the Trump administration views as “religious liberty.” With Hobby Lobby, the Supreme Court turned RFRA into a dangerous new weapon. The Trump administration has now taken up its call to arms.

If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered

Pine Mt Beagles
Posts: 7803
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Pineville Ky

Re: Republican Nazi's

Post by Pine Mt Beagles »

POSTED ONSAT, MAY 6TH, 2017 BY JASON EASLEY
Family Crime Wave Grows As Trump In Laws Caught Selling US Visas To Wealthy Chinese Investors

Trump’s son in law’s sister Nicole Kushner gave a presentation in China explaining how wealthy investors could immigrate to the US by investing $500,000 in a Kushner real estate project in New Jersey.

The Washington Post reported, “Over several hours of slide shows and presentations, representatives from the Kushner family business urged Chinese citizens gathered at the Ritz-Carlton hotel to consider investing hundreds of thousands of dollars in a New Jersey real estate project to secure what’s known as an investor visa…Saturday’s event in Beijing was hosted by the Chinese company Qiaowai, which connects U.S. companies with Chinese investors. The tagline on a brochure for the event: “Invest $500,000 and immigrate to the United States.”

The Kushners are selling their connection to the President Of The United States as a way to make money while allowing wealthy Chinese people to immigrate to the United States. This is the exact opposite of the “America First” policy that Trump is talking about it. Apparently, Trump’s tough stance on immigration doesn’t apply to investors in his in-laws’ projects.

If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered

Rabbithoundjb
Posts: 4516
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Rocky Mount, NC

Re: Republican Nazi's

Post by Rabbithoundjb »

You should move over to Virginia PMB. A KKK Democrat governor and a sexual assault Democrat lutienant governor, your kind of people. You would think the Gore's and Clinton's where running Virginia. Oh well Demoncrats 6 of 1 half dozen of the other, all the same.

Newt
Posts: 5358
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:42 am

Re: Republican Nazi's

Post by Newt »

To be sure, Demoncrats are not fake Christians. The are out front and scream it loudly. They hate Christians and despise Christianity. They hate babies, hate success, and are jealous and vindictive towards anyone who tries to succeed.
They hate the Bible because it stands against everything they believe. The Bible warns about democrats, "they will have a reprobate mind".
Reprobate: an unprincipled person, PM's picture was on the page .
synonyms:
rogue,Shumer.
rascal,Clintons.
scoundrel, Waters and Pelosi.
good-for-nothing, democrat voters.
villain, Schiff.
wretch, Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
unprincipled person, Hillary.
rake, Huma Abadin
profligate, Comey
degenerate, Podesta
debauchee, Barney Frank.
libertine, ; More

How could anyone who loves children, ugh grandchildren, vote for baby torturers and murderers?
They are as sick as Hitler and Dr Mengele

Pine Mt Beagles
Posts: 7803
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Pineville Ky

Re: Republican Nazi's

Post by Pine Mt Beagles »

There is no Low like republican Low,,

Traitors,,
Child Molesstors
Terrorists
Women Beaters
Blassfemmers
Reprobates
Liars
Thieves
Hippocrits
republicans want blink when they are called one of the above,,,WHY,,,

Because it takes all the above and more to get just a small idea of what kind of Scum republicans really are.

It will take a Century to get America back ,to the once great country it was before trump,,,it Took ,,,President Barack Obama,-8- years to wash some of the smell off from the bush,cheney years .

republicans ,,,destroy everything they touch.pollute the air they breathe.

If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered

Newt
Posts: 5358
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:42 am

Re: Republican Nazi's

Post by Newt »

Pine Mt Beagles wrote:
Wed Feb 06, 2019 4:07 pm
There is no Low like republican Low,,

Traitors,,
Child Molesstors
Terrorists
Women Beaters
Blassfemmers
Reprobates
Liars
Thieves
Hippocrits
republicans want blink when they are called one of the above,,,WHY,,,

Because it takes all the above and more to get just a small idea of what kind of Scum republicans really are.
Why? Because they know its the rantings of a reprobate mind.

brewer69kennels
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:24 pm

Re: Republican Nazi's

Post by brewer69kennels »

Yea much better to stick a scaple into a babies heart and rip their limbs off moments before birth, and than to stand a cheer about the right to do it. Sick SOBs, you dems are some fine folks. Whose next the elderly because caring for them would cause an inconvenience

Newt
Posts: 5358
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:42 am

Re: Republican Nazi's

Post by Newt »

PM, maybe you should move to Virginia. The Dem Governor is a racist, the Lt Governor is a sexual predator, the Atty Gen is a Racist. They are running out of Dems, maybe an unknown reprobate would be a possibility. Send them a copy of your posts in the Political Board and that should be enough proof that you are a qualified democrat.

Rabbithoundjb
Posts: 4516
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Rocky Mount, NC

Re: Republican Nazi's

Post by Rabbithoundjb »

PMB may be over qualified Newt.

littlewoody
Posts: 2144
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:06 pm
Location: MICHGAN

Re: Republican Nazi's

Post by littlewoody »

Rabbithoundjb wrote:
Tue Feb 05, 2019 7:21 am
You should move over to Virginia PMB. A KKK Democrat governor and a sexual assault Democrat lutienant governor, your kind of people. You would think the Gore's and Clinton's where running Virginia. Oh well Demoncrats 6 of 1 half dozen of the other, all the same.
HA HA ! :lol:
TheJohnBirchSociety

Rabbithoundjb
Posts: 4516
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Rocky Mount, NC

Re: Republican Nazi's

Post by Rabbithoundjb »

Add the attorney general to the growing list.

Post Reply