One Question Survey

[TC]

One Question Survey

O.K. Everyone!! Here is your chance to, at least silently, vent. Hope you take the opportunity.


MSNBC has been viciously critical of conservative Americans and conservative causes. They have an online poll asking if Arizona 's immigration law should be on the books. I think MSNBC will be shocked at America 's response...

If you don't do anything else today, please answer this MSNBC Poll question and forward it on to as many people as you can. The silent majority must not be silent on this one.

Answer This ONE Question! - Then Pass It Along!








http://world-news.newsvine.com/_questio ... mmigration

[bluegrass]

I just voted and I had to LMFAO after seeing the results...apparently MSNBC is as out of touch as Rufus is...as of my vote, 95.7% voted in FAVOR of the Arizona Immigration bill....you KNOW they weren't expecting THAT big of a margin....LOLOL.


Of course Rufus will just call all 95.7% RACIST TEABAGGERS....LOL.


Who is out of touch???

[Tim H]

Almost 2 million for the law being enforced and less than 100, 000 against the law being enforced. How does that line up with Obama wanting to fight that law in court? Want to bet that poll doesn't Lead MSNBC's news even though it is overwhelming proof that the liberals are against the American Citizens. Also, considering most polls have a 2-4% margin of error. What if the error is the 4% who voted in the poll against the law? HMMM!?

Go fight this law Obama, Pelosi and Reid. There are about 97% of the country (racist teabaggers of course) who are watching!!!

I guess the racist teabaggers watch more than FOX NEWS? Kinda shoots that argument in the foot. Either that or a bunch of LIBERALS are now the party of NO teabagger racists too.

The truth is regardless of what the extreme leftist want you to believe, most American Citizens think something against the law, should be considered illegal and enforced as such.

I guess if I use Obama and Pelosi and Reids approach,

The next time I get pulled over for speeding I can just tell the officer he is only enforcing that law cause he is profiling people who "go fast". If I just change the word from "speeding" (illegal alien) to "going fast" (undocumented person) then I am not breaking any law or at the very least it should not be enforced because the officer is only targeting people who are "going fast". Besides that "If the old lady really wanted to get across the street (Wanted the job I took), she would have been walking faster (been employed there already)." "If the car manufacture (person who hired me) hadn't made the car capable of going fast (hadn't given me a job for cash) then I wouldn't have been speeding in the first place." Why hold me responsible when it is everyone elses fault I was "going fast". I was just trying to get to my job so I could provide for my family. Since I was already on the road, I should be pardoned from speeding (amnesty).

[Pine Mt Beagles]

by Tim H on Mon Jul 05, 2010 4:48 am

Almost 2 million for the law being enforced and less than 100, 000 against the law being enforced. How does that line up with Obama wanting to fight that law in court? Want to bet that poll doesn't Lead MSNBC's news even though it is overwhelming proof that the liberals are against the American Citizens. Also, considering most polls have a 2-4% margin of error. What if the error is the 4% who voted in the poll against the law? HMMM!?

Go fight this law Obama, Pelosi and Reid. There are about 97% of the country (racist teabaggers of course) who are watching!!!

I guess the racist teabaggers watch more than FOX NEWS? Kinda shoots that argument in the foot. Either that or a bunch of LIBERALS are now the party of NO teabagger racists too.
-
-WELL YOU GOT THE RACIST TEA BAGGER'S- RIGHT-UNDERSTAND THE POLL AND THE ANSWER ABOUT THE ARIZONA LAW.
-BUT DON'T FORGET THERE ARE NO REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVE IT'S A -MYTH-JUST LIKE SAYING LIBERAL'S ARE AGAINST AMERICAN'S,,,, SINCE IT IS PROVEN EVERY DAY- THAT -REPUBLICAN'S -HATE CHILDREN, POOR ,AND ELDERLY CITIZEN'S.AND THERE IS LESS THAT 20 5 OF AMERICAN'S THAT WILL CLAIM ASSSOCIATION WITH THE TEA BAGGER'S ,YOU GUY'S LIVE IN THE REPUBLICAN FAIRY LAND .

[Collins Country]

Rufus, you are pathetic! The world would be better off if people like you found yourselves a little island and stayed there! I AM A REPUBLICAN AND darn PROUD OF IT!!!!!!!!! YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY STANDS FOR EXCEPT THAT IT IS AGAINST YOUR lord obama!

[Newt]

by Tim H on Mon Jul 05, 2010 4:48 am

]
I guess the racist teabaggers watch more than FOX NEWS? Kinda shoots that argument in the foot. Either that or a bunch of LIBERALS are now the party of NO teabagger racists too.[/b]
-
-WELL YOU GOT THE RACIST TEA BAGGER'S- RIGHT-UNDERSTAND THE POLL AND THE ANSWER ABOUT THE ARIZONA LAW.
-BUT DON'T FORGET THERE ARE NO REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVE IT'S A -MYTH-JUST LIKE SAYING LIBERAL'S ARE AGAINST AMERICAN'S,,,, SINCE IT IS PROVEN EVERY DAY- THAT -REPUBLICAN'S -HATE CHILDREN, POOR ,AND ELDERLY CITIZEN'S.AND THERE IS LESS THAT 20 5 OF AMERICAN'S THAT WILL CLAIM ASSSOCIATION WITH THE TEA BAGGER'S ,YOU GUY'S LIVE IN THE REPUBLICAN FAIRY LAND .

Hmmmm???
USA Today is out with a new poll on Tea Party supporters. Near the top of both the article and the accompanying graphic is this point, also singled out by Howard Kurtz in his Washington Post report on the study:

They are overwhelmingly white and Anglo,

Not too surprising, perhaps. Economic conservatives, we hear, are more white than the national average. But wait — here’s the rest of Kurtz’s sentence:

although a scattering of Hispanics, Asian Americans and African Americans combine to make up almost one-fourth of their ranks.

“Almost one-fourth of their ranks” is “a scattering”? Sounds like a pretty good chunk to me, especially in a country that is after still mostly white. Let’s go to the tape. The data-filled graphic says that 77 percent of Tea Party supporters are “non-Hispanic whites.” And this 2008 Census report says that the United States as a whole is 65 percent non-Hispanic white. So the Tea Party is indeed somewhat more “white” than the country at large, but not by that much. Twelve points above the national average is not “overwhelmingly white,” and 23 percent Hispanics, Asian Americans and African Americans is not “a scattering.” At a rough estimate, it represents about 14 million non-Anglo Americans who support the Tea Party movement.

How does this compare to the demographics of other movements? Strangely enough, I can’t find any real data on the demographics of the enviromental movement. Maybe pollsters and mainstream journalists don’t want to know. But here’s a report that 84 percent of the visitors to the Sierra Club website are Caucasian. Similar implication here. And here’s a story on the environmentalist movement’s desperate attempt to seem not so “overwhelmingly white.” Yet somehow journalists don’t focus on that obvious fact about the environmentalist movement.

Instead, they keep describing the Tea Party movement as “overwhelmingly white,” even when the data suggest a different conclusion.