Obama and thugs at it again DoD RetaliatesAgainst Major Cook

[TC]

General And Lt. Colonel Join Lawsuit


The Ledger-Enquirer (GA) reports that a controversial suit brought by a U.S. Army reservist has been joined by a retired Army two-star general and an active reserve Air Force lieutenant colonel.

Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook filed the suit July 8 in federal court here asking for conscientious objector status and a preliminary injunction based upon his belief that Barack Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States and is therefore ineligible to serve as president of the United States and commander-in-chief of the U.S. Armed Forces.

However, before the issue got to court, Cook’s orders to deploy to Afghanistan were revoked. Lt. Col. Maria Quon, a public affairs officer with the U.S. Army Human Resources Command-St. Louis, said Tuesday that Cook was no longer expected to report Wednesday to MacDill Air Force Base in Florida for mobilization to active duty. Cook, who claims he is now the victim of retaliation due to his suit, received his mobilization orders to report for active duty at MacDill on Wednesday. From there, he was to go to Fort Benning on Saturday for deployment to Afghanistan.

The government, in its response to the suit, claims that Cook’s suit is "moot" in that he already has been told he doesn’t have to go to Afghanistan, so the relief he is seeking has been granted.

"The Commanding General of SOCCENT (U.S. Special Operations Central Command) has determined that he does not want the services of Major Cook, and has revoked his deployment orders," the response states.

Update: Federal judge dismisses reservist's suit questioning Obama's presidency.

A federal judge this morning dismissed the suit filed here by a U.S. Army reservist who says he shouldn't have to go to Afghanistan because he believes Barack Obama was never eligible to be president.

Judge Clay Land sided with the defense, which claimed in its response to Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook's suit, filed July 8th with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, that Cook’s suit is "moot" in that he already has been told he doesn’t have to go to Afghanistan, so the relief he is seeking has been granted.

"Federal court only has authority of actual cases and controversies," Land said. "The entire action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."

Oh, and you're unemployed too . . .
Lawsuits
7/16/09 DoD Retaliates Against Major Cook


JAMES weblog reports that retaliation has occurred or begun against Plaintiff Stefan Frederick Cook for the exercise of his First Amendment right to petition for redress of grievances and Plaintiff Cook accordingly here seeks an injunction against the continuance or full implementation of this official governmental retaliation or in the alternative for a writ of mandamus, order to show cause, or rule nisi be issued to the Department of Defense commanding it to cease, cure, or remedy all retaliation against Plaintiff Cook. The circumstances are as follows:

Late on Tuesday afternoon, July 14, 2009, at around about 4:30 pm, Plaintiff Stefan Frederick Cook returned a call to an unknown telephone call from (813) 828-5884 and was told that his services were no longer required in Afghanistan and that he need not report for duty. In addition Plaintiff an e-mail with the revocation order attached from Master Sargeant Miguel Matos (Exhibit C). Upon receipt of the revocation, Plaintiff Major Cook called his civilian boss, the CEO of Simtech, Inc., a closely held corporation that does DOD contracting in the general field of information technology/systems integration, at which Plaintiff Major was employed until taking a Military Leave of Absence on Friday July 10, 2009, a senior systems engineer and architect, in preparation for his deployment to Afghanistan. (Plaintiff has five Cisco Systems certifications in information technology dating from 2000 and just recertified in June 2009 for the Cisco Certified Design Expert qualification exam.)

The CEO of Simtech, Inc., Larry Grice, explained to Plaintiff over a series of four conversations within the next two hours, that he had been terminated. Grice told the Plaintiff that he would no longer be welcome in his former position at SOCOM but that Grice wanted to see whether he could find something within the company (Simtech, Inc.) for Cook. The upshot was that at this time Grice did not have anything for Plaintiff to do. Grice told Plaintiff, in essence, that the situation had become "nutty and crazy," and that Plaintiff would no longer be able to work at his old position.

Grice explained that he had been in touch with Defense Security Services (DSS -- an agency of the Department of Defense, with regional offices located in SOCOM Headquarters at McDill Airforce Base in Tampa, Florida), and that DSS had not yet made a determination whether Plaintiff Major Cook’s clearances would be pulled, but Grice made clear to Cook that it was DSS who had compelled Cook’s termination. Essentially, because of the "nutty and crazy" situation and the communications received from DSS was no longer employable by him at all. So he was not optimistic about getting me another job at the company. Grice also reported to Plaintiff that there was some gossip that "people were disappointed in" the Plaintiff because they thought he was manipulating his deployment orders to create a platform for political purposes. Grice then discussed Plaintiff’s expectation of receiving final paychecks (including accrued leave pay) already owed, without any severance pay, and wished the Plaintiff well.

A federal agency (such as the Department of Defense, acting through the Defense Security Services Agency) clearly violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if it takes or fails to take (or threatens to take or fail to take) a personnel action with respect to any employee or applicant because of any disclosure of information by the employee or applicant that he or she reasonably believes evidences a violation of a law, rule or regulation; gross mismanagement; gross waste of funds; an abuse of authority; or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety. What has happened in the present case of Stefan Frederick Cook is that a federal agency appears to have taken action against Stefan Frederick Cook’s private employer, Simtech, Inc., which is a closely held corporation owned and operated by members of a single family, who are as much victims of the Department of Defense’ heavy-handed interference with Plaintiff Cook’s private-sector employment as is Plaintiff Cook himself.

[tommyg]

I was reading this the other day as well as the Health Care Reform bill,it was easy to see that this Tyrant Obama is willing to do anything it takes to bring America down. He should be tried for treason against the American people. The Health Care Bill is scarey to say the least,he is attacking the elderly and the young,it is a nightmare and needs to be stopped. Their will be rationing and people over 50 will be denied treatments that would prolong life and quality of life. Emannuals Brother is the driving force behind this nightmare and you should read some of the stuff this Animal has written about the elderly and young. These are vermin in DC,no better than Animals.

[Pine Mt Beagles]

SOUNDS LIKE JUST ANOTHER DRAFT DODGER,, STORY EXCEPT HE WAS ALREADY IN AND DIDN'T WANT TO FULL FILL HIS DUTY,,------------TREASON YOU SAY, I SAY NA ,GEORGE BUSH WAS A TRAITOR ,TYRANT, DICTATOR,HE IS STILL FREE , SO GOES THE STORY,,,,,,,,,

[Rabbithoundjb]

I am going to agree with both of you, I can't believe this major would try and dodge his commitment and I still can't believe the majority of americans are so unimformed that they would elect someone with so many question marks surrounding them.

Pine mt if they had anything on Bush the liberals would have already buried him, you keep listening to those lies. The facts are that Bush has been charged with nothing, only liberal allegations just like yours.

On the other hand Gerald Walpin has filed charges against Obama for his firing as inspector general.

[Pine Mt Beagles]

RABBIT HOUND
YOU MAKE A GOOD POINT NO CHARGES YET AND MAYBE NEVER, HE CAN THANK OBAMA FOR THAT, I THINK IT WOULD BE A BAD PRESIDENT TO SET,GOING AFTER FORMER PRESIDENT'S,,BUT I DO THINK AS MOST AMERICANS HE IS GUILTY,OF MISREPRESENTING THE CIA REPORTS.........

[Rabbithoundjb]

Obama gets no credit for whats not there. what someone thinks is far short of making it facts. Thats called an opinion!!!!!!!

[tommyg]

If Obama and the Liberals thought they could prove anything on Bush they would go for it. Its their way of doing things,smeer and Lie. They don't have anything on Bush as the American people know he did what made us safe,only anti American Liberals think different.

[Pine Mt Beagles]

by tommyg on Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:42 am

If Obama and the Liberals thought they could prove anything on Bush they would go for it. Its their way of doing things,smeer and Lie. They don't have anything on Bush as the American people know he did what made us safe,only anti American Liberals think different.-----

-----------9 1 1 Bush was president and had intel before it happened and ignored it...
AND YOU HAVE LIBERALS MIXED UP WITH REPUBLICANS --NO ONE COULD BE MORE ANTI AMERICAN,THAN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY....THE POLITICIANS,,,INSIDE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAVE A WAY OF DOING JUST THE OPPOSITE, OF WHAT THE PEOPLE ELECT THEM TO DO,GOOD PEOPLE ELECT THEM WITH GOOD INTENTIONS ,THEN GET SOLD OUT,,,,,,,,HISTORY

[Rabbithoundjb]

Same ole tired B.S. Pine mt. Your guy is miserably failing and you want to talk about anything else.

[bluegrass]

by tommyg on Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:42 am

If Obama and the Liberals thought they could prove anything on Bush they would go for it. Its their way of doing things,smeer and Lie. They don't have anything on Bush as the American people know he did what made us safe,only anti American Liberals think different.-----

-----------9 1 1 Bush was president and had intel before it happened and ignored it...
AND YOU HAVE LIBERALS MIXED UP WITH REPUBLICANS --NO ONE COULD BE MORE ANTI AMERICAN,THAN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY....THE POLITICIANS,,,INSIDE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAVE A WAY OF DOING JUST THE OPPOSITE, OF WHAT THE PEOPLE ELECT THEM TO DO,GOOD PEOPLE ELECT THEM WITH GOOD INTENTIONS ,THEN GET SOLD OUT,,,,,,,,HISTORY

No, its not HISTORY...its revisionist history...please allow some corrections here...

1. While Bush MAY have had some intel suggesting that this type of terror attack was possible, it wasnt BUSH who refused to take Bin Laden when he was offered...IT WAS YOUR BUDDY CLINTON...thats not opinion, thats FACT. This all happened well before Bush took office...so who gets the blame the most here??? CLINTON.

2. NO ONE COULD BE MORE ANTI AMERICAN,THAN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY...this statement is one of your worst ever Rufus...it wasnt Republican politicians who said that the Marines were murderers, cold blooded killers that were terrorizing innocent citizens in Iraq, it was John Murtha, DEMOCRAT from Pennsylvania...it wasnt a Republican politician who said our soldiers in Vietnam were raiding villages, raping and pillaging in a fashion reminiscent of Ghengis Kahn, it was a DEMOCRAT named John Kerry...I could go on and on if you like, but these are two of the more recognizable examples of DEMOCRAT antipathy towards the US Military...I dont know very many things more UN AMERICAN than running down our Military....

3. ..THE POLITICIANS,,,INSIDE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAVE A WAY OF DOING JUST THE OPPOSITE, OF WHAT THE PEOPLE ELECT THEM TO DO,GOOD PEOPLE ELECT THEM WITH GOOD INTENTIONS ,THEN GET SOLD OUT...do you mean like those that voted for HOPE AND CHANGE??? The ones that voted for Obambi because he lied and said he would have more transparency in his administration, yet has already been accused by LIBERALS as well as conservatives of being even more secretive than the Bush administration??? Or maybe those that voted for Obambi because he said he was going to bring the troops home from Iraq....yet he lied and IF he brings them home they only get to stay a while before deploying to Afghanistan???? Or maybe those that voted for Obambi because he said he was going to close Guantanamo Bay prison, yet decides its too risky to do so at this time??? Or those that voted for Obambi because he said everyone would see a tax cut and an increase in their paychecks because of it....yet the extra 7 dollars a week is going to be eaten up by the massive tax increases coming if he gets his Cap and Trade bill as well as the HUGE tax increase we will ALL see when/if he gets any sort of Socialized Medicine bill passed?? Those the kinds of things you are talking about Rufus???


Get real Rufus...the Bible mentions something about people who while "professing themselves to be wise became fools"...wanna guess which one you sound like here????



Tony

[2500 HD]

Excellent post bluegrass....... You just laid TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Pine Mt Beagles]

No, its not HISTORY...its revisionist history...please allow some corrections here...

1. While Bush MAY have had some intel suggesting that this type of terror attack was possible, it wasnt BUSH who refused to take Bin Laden when he was offered...IT WAS YOUR BUDDY CLINTON...thats not opinion, thats FACT. This all happened well before Bush took office...so who gets the blame the most here??? CLINTON.-

------------------------FLAT OUT LIE,,,BUSH HAD THE INFO DIDN'T ACT,HE KILLED OVER THREE THOUSAND AMERICANS BECAUSE OF POOR LEADERSHIP ,AND NONE ACTION,,,HE KNEW BINLADEN WOULD WIN HIM THE NEXT ELECTION,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

2. NO ONE COULD BE MORE ANTI AMERICAN,THAN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY...this statement is one of your worst ever Rufus...it wasnt Republican politicians who said that the Marines were murderers, cold blooded killers that were terrorizing innocent citizens in Iraq, it was John Murtha, DEMOCRAT from Pennsylvania...it wasnt a Republican politician who said our soldiers in Vietnam were raiding villages, raping and pillaging in a fashion reminiscent of Ghengis Kahn, it was a DEMOCRAT named John Kerry...I could go on and on if you like, but these are two of the more recognizable examples of DEMOCRAT antipathy towards the US Military...I dont know very many things more UN AMERICAN than running down our Military....

YES IT WAS THE REPUBLICANS 100%,,WHO TRIED TO DESTROY JOHN KERRY WHO TRIED TO GET IT STOPPED, KERRY PUT A LIGHT ON WHAT THE REPUBLICANS, WERE DOING,KILLING INNOCENT PEOPLE, RAPING ETC, AND COVERING IT UP, HE HAD THE GUT'S TO STAND UP AND SAY THIS HAS TO STOP..THE REPUBLICAN MURDERS ,SWIFT BOATED HIM WITH ALL THE MONEY THEY HAD AT THE TIME AND FLAT LIED AND EVEN SOME OF THEM CAME OUT LATER AND SAID THEY WERE MISQUOTED,,,JUST ANOTHER REPUBLICAN LIE

3. ..THE POLITICIANS,,,INSIDE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAVE A WAY OF DOING JUST THE OPPOSITE, OF WHAT THE PEOPLE ELECT THEM TO DO,GOOD PEOPLE ELECT THEM WITH GOOD INTENTIONS ,THEN GET SOLD OUT.ABSOLUTE FACT..[/b]do you mean like those that voted for HOPE AND CHANGE??? The ones that voted for Obambi because he lied and said he would have more transparency in his administration, yet has already been accused by LIBERALS as well as conservatives of being even more secretive than the Bush administration??? Or maybe those that voted for Obambi because he said he was going to bring the troops home from Iraq....yet he lied and IF he brings them home they only get to stay a while before deploying to Afghanistan???? Or maybe those that voted for Obambi because he said he was going to close Guantanamo Bay prison, yet decides its too risky to do so at this time??? Or those that voted for Obambi because he said everyone would see a tax cut and an increase in their paychecks because of it....yet the extra 7 dollars a week is going to be eaten up by the massive tax increases coming if he gets his Cap and Trade bill as well as the HUGE tax increase we will ALL see when/if he gets any sort of Socialized Medicine bill passed?? Those the kinds of things you are talking about Rufus???----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------HE HAS NOT LIED AS OF YET,,,,NONE OF THE B.S. IN THE ABOVE PARAGRAPH HAS COME TRUE--JUST REPUBLICAN B.S.--SMOKE AND IF HE RETIRED, TODAY HE WILL HAVE DONE, MORE FOR AMERICA, THAN ANY REPUBLICAN, IN MANY YEARS IF HE DON'T DO ANYTHING ELSE,ACTUALLY I THINK HE WOULD ,I KNOW I DO THANK YOU FOR POINTING OUT, THESE THINGS ,SINCE HE IS RIGHT ON TARGET, TRYING TO GET THEM DONE, AND THE TEA DRINKING REPUBLICAN'S, HAVE SOLD THEIR SOULS, TO TRY AND STOP HIM FROM HELPING AMERICA,BUT MOST AMERICAN HAVE FINALLY SEEN THROUGH ALL THE SMOKE,,,THEY HAVE QUIT TRYING TO GOVERN AND STARTED,,, JUST RESIGNING LIKE PALIN ,,OR JUST RUN OFF WITH THEIR GIRL FRIEND FOR THE WEEK,,AND HIDDING,WHICH IS BEST FOR THE COUNTRY ANTWAY,,,,,,,,,


Get real Rufus...the Bible mentions something about people who while "professing themselves to be wise became fools"...wanna guess which one you sound like here????
I THINK IT MIGHT GO LIKE THIS
THOSE THAT TRY TO PREDICT THE FUTURE ARE FOOL'S,I THINK MIGHT BE THE CORRECT QUOTE----------------------------------------WHICH WAS ALL YOU SAID IN THE ENTIRE POST,,,,,,,

2500 V.D.----------YOU MIGHT TRY A DIFFERENT KIND OF TEA YOU MUST BE DRINKING ,,THE POOR FOLKS TEA,,,


I KNOW AMERICA NEEDS A TWO PARTY SYSTEM ,IT IS DESIGNED TO WORK THAT WAY,,WE HAVE TO FIND AN INDEPENDENT PARTY AND DUM THE ANTI AMERICAN REPUBLICAN ELITE TEA DRINKERS,,,,AMERICA CANNOT AFFORD THEM ANY MORE,,,,,,,,

[barnold1]

America couldn't go on without those you call the "elite tea drinkers" because there wouldn't be anybody for the ibtards to mooch from. God knows they sorry asses can't self-sustain.

Have this flashback with yo hater-aid:

[Pine Mt Beagles]

barnold1 on Thu Jul 23, 2009 5:59 pm

America couldn't go on without those you call the "elite tea drinkers" because there wouldn't be anybody for the ibtards to mooch from. God knows they sorry asses can't self-sustain.

Have this flashback with yo hater-aid,,
I LIKE YOUR TEA DRINKER ATTITUDE,,RUDE SELF REIGHTEOUS,HIPPOCRIT ,ENJOY YOUR TEA ,

[tommyg]

barnold1 on Thu Jul 23, 2009 5:59 pm

America couldn't go on without those you call the "elite tea drinkers" because there wouldn't be anybody for the ibtards to mooch from. God knows they sorry asses can't self-sustain.

Have this flashback with yo hater-aid,,
I LIKE YOUR TEA DRINKER ATTITUDE,,RUDE SELF REIGHTEOUS,HIPPOCRIT ,ENJOY YOUR TEA ,

WE DO!!!