DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Share thoughts, news, views, etc. WARNING, this forum contains a lot of heated political debate. Harsh profanity is not allowed, but if you are easily offended, do not visit this forum.

Moderators: Pike Ridge Beagles, Aaron Bartlett

Post Reply
ricky murphy

DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Post by ricky murphy »

It is a sad sad day for American when it no longer takes care of its sick and elderly. :eyes: :eyes: :bash: :blackeye:


Newt
Posts: 5358
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:42 am

Re: DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Post by Newt »

Obama is cutting the budget in anticipation of the death panels and rationing of health care will eliminate seniors.
Plus the waiting lines at the hospital will eliminate a lot of drug abusers who overdose or attemtp to commit suicide. Now those people are recycled on a bi monthly period. Once they are nursed back to health they are discharged then repeatedly come back once they wreck their health again.

Pine Mt Beagles
Posts: 7803
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Pineville Ky

Re: DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Post by Pine Mt Beagles »

SO WHAT IS ANY DIFFERENT THAN IT IS TODAY,,,,,,,,,,
--

If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered

2500 HD
Posts: 1410
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:39 pm

Re: DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Post by 2500 HD »

Looks to me about $460 billion less in Medicare :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :loser: :loser: :loser: :loser:

User avatar
TC
Posts: 3829
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 1:36 am
Location: Kentucky
Contact:

Re: DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Post by TC »

ricky murphy wrote:It is a sad sad day for American when it no longer takes care of its sick and elderly. :eyes: :eyes: :bash: :blackeye:
Well I can see now the Social Security budget will be back under control, with the Medicare being rationed what a way to trim the fat and fix two budgets with one cut.... Don't pay for medical bills, no medical for the elderly, they don't live much past retirement age so they wont be paying Social Security Benefits and look another set of jobs lost due to no retirement homes for the elderly because it is cut from the budget, another burden on the working folks to try and take care of grannie with alzheimers work and take care of the kids and grannie lights on but no one home, what a burden on the younger folks, not that I have no respect for the elderly but I wouldn't want my kid to take care of me when I get like that, it is just to much to expect, jokes on us that have been paying in since we were 15 years old. Retirement won't happen for us will it, work till you drop dead cause you won't have any security, or medical assistance.
From Field to Show and Show to Field the way it should be

Pine Mt Beagles
Posts: 7803
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Pineville Ky

Re: DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Post by Pine Mt Beagles »

By Dr. David Gratzer

Thursday, December 3rd 2009, 4:00 AM
Related NewsCarroll: Get into shape to win the RaceSchoen: Obama has lost the centerSchumer says Dems will pass health care reform with or without GOPersHealth care overhaul FAQsIt's that time of year again: Washington is talking about cuts to Medicare. President Obama's health-care reforms depend on them - up to $400 billion worth over 10 years.

As a psychiatrist, I'll break the bad news gently: Medicare cuts are like Santa Claus and his flying reindeers - often talked about, never actually seen.

The federal government has long fought to control Medicare spending. Today's Medicare program costs taxpayers twice what it did 10 years ago. But whenever lawmakers from either party agree to savings, Congress reverses course, fearing cuts will anger voters on Election Day.

Congress reversed planned cuts in 1999. And 2005. And 2004. And 2006. In fact, since 1997, when members of-""- both parties ""--agreed to automatic cuts if spending rose faster than population and economic growth, the program has been cut just"" once"", in 2002.
--
--
--MORE MISDIRECTION AND SCARE TACTICS,,,,,,,,,,,

If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered

ricky murphy

Re: DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Post by ricky murphy »

:blackeye: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :bash: :bozo: :angel:

User avatar
TC
Posts: 3829
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 1:36 am
Location: Kentucky
Contact:

Re: DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Post by TC »

Pine Mt Beagles wrote:By Dr. David Gratzer

Thursday, December 3rd 2009, 4:00 AM
Related NewsCarroll: Get into shape to win the RaceSchoen: Obama has lost the centerSchumer says Dems will pass health care reform with or without GOPersHealth care overhaul FAQsIt's that time of year again: Washington is talking about cuts to Medicare. President Obama's health-care reforms depend on them - up to $400 billion worth over 10 years.

As a psychiatrist, I'll break the bad news gently: Medicare cuts are like Santa Claus and his flying reindeers - often talked about, never actually seen.

The federal government has long fought to control Medicare spending. Today's Medicare program costs taxpayers twice what it did 10 years ago. But whenever lawmakers from either party agree to savings, Congress reverses course, fearing cuts will anger voters on Election Day.

Congress reversed planned cuts in 1999. And 2005. And 2004. And 2006. In fact, since 1997, when members of-""- both parties ""--agreed to automatic cuts if spending rose faster than population and economic growth, the program has been cut just"" once"", in 2002.
--
--
--MORE MISDIRECTION AND SCARE TACTICS,,,,,,,,,,,
Well I wouldn't get your hopes up to much AARP is backing the cuts, but hey they have a lot to gain with cuts in Medicare for they will be picking up the clients that loose benefits, which means they charge higher premiums to the elderly. The Senior Citizens need to dump AARP but most don't know how to find another medical coverage, or don't know there is other insurers out there that will cover them or maybe since they have existing ailments they wouldn't be covered, don't know the reasoning behind the elderly sticking with a cut throat company like that but they are.
From Field to Show and Show to Field the way it should be

ricky murphy

Re: DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Post by ricky murphy »

The fact about medicare is that already IT pays doctors "so little" for there services alot of Doctors are getting where they dont want to take any more medicare patients because medicare dont pay enough .NO MORE ABOMINATION!!!!!!!

Pine Mt Beagles
Posts: 7803
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Pineville Ky

Re: DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Post by Pine Mt Beagles »

by ricky murphy on Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:29 pm

The fact about medicare is that already IT pays doctors "so little" for there services alot of Doctors are getting where they dont want to take any more medicare patients because medicare dont pay enough --!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RICKY
I WAS WITH YOU UNTIL YOU GOT OFF TRACK,,,,,,,,,,,,

If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered

bluegrass
Posts: 3156
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:50 pm
Location: Greenville, MI

Re: DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Post by bluegrass »

Pine Mt Beagles wrote:by ricky murphy on Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:29 pm

The fact about medicare is that already IT pays doctors "so little" for there services alot of Doctors are getting where they dont want to take any more medicare patients because medicare dont pay enough --!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RICKY
I WAS WITH YOU UNTIL YOU GOT OFF TRACK,,,,,,,,,,,,

See how ANGRY Rufus gets when you say something bad about HIS GOD????



Tony
The 1st amendment allows the usual liberal narcissistic "I think.." which is how they start all their sentences.

The second amendment protects us from implementing "I think"

Pine Mt Beagles
Posts: 7803
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Pineville Ky

Re: DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Post by Pine Mt Beagles »

NOW ----TONY-- HOW DID YOU GET ANYTHING ANGRY OUT OF THAT ANSWER,, ACTUALLY IT WAS VERY MELLOW,,,AND I WORSHIP NO MAN,,,,,,,ALL I'AM SAYING THE MAN HAS FOUR YEARS IT IS STILL TO EARLY ,TO THROW HIM OUT,,,,,AND IF WE DID WHAT WOULD WE GET,,,,,,,

If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered

bluegrass
Posts: 3156
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:50 pm
Location: Greenville, MI

Re: DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Post by bluegrass »

Pine Mt Beagles wrote:NOW ----TONY-- HOW DID YOU GET ANYTHING ANGRY OUT OF THAT ANSWER,, ACTUALLY IT WAS VERY MELLOW,,,AND I WORSHIP NO MAN,,,,,,,ALL I'AM SAYING THE MAN HAS FOUR YEARS IT IS STILL TO EARLY ,TO THROW HIM OUT,,,,,AND IF WE DID WHAT WOULD WE GET,,,,,,,


Little late to worry about Biden isnt it???

Maybe it would be Pelosi since she is second in line after Biden and I am prettty sure the Secret Service is under orders to get rid of Biden should something happen to Obambi...LOL.


I would have preferred that NONE of them were in office...as bad as Bush was on spending, he still spent less, way less than Obambi and the rest of his clan....Obambi is going to wind up making Bush look like Reagan...



Tony
The 1st amendment allows the usual liberal narcissistic "I think.." which is how they start all their sentences.

The second amendment protects us from implementing "I think"

ricky murphy

Re: DEMOCRATS "CUT" 460 BILLION IN MEDICARE

Post by ricky murphy »

Pine Mt Beagles wrote:NOW ----TONY-- HOW DID YOU GET ANYTHING ANGRY OUT OF THAT ANSWER,, ACTUALLY IT WAS VERY MELLOW,,,AND I WORSHIP NO MAN,,,,,,,ALL I'AM SAYING THE MAN HAS FOUR YEARS IT IS STILL TO EARLY ,TO THROW HIM OUT,,,,,AND IF WE DID WHAT WOULD WE GET,,,,,,,
" AND IF WE DID WHAT WOULD WE GET" Hopefully we would replace obomination with an American. :angel:

Post Reply