letter to the editor of The Silverton Standard and The Miner by a retired geologist predicted the disastrous toxic spill in Colorado at the hands of the Environmental Protection Agency exactly one week prior to the accident. Taking it one step further, the author added that they will do this on purpose in order to secure more funding.
On July 30, 2015, Dave Taylor wrote to the editor warning that the EPA is planning a "Superfund biltzkrieg" for the Gold King mine in Silverton, Colorado. If the site were to be granted Superfund status as the EPA has long desired (25 years), they would be entitled to federal monies up-front for any cleanups. And that's exactly what Taylor suggested in his prophetic writing:
Based on my 47 years of experience as a professional geologist, it appears to me that the EPA is setting your town and the area up for a possible Superfund blitzkrieg.
Taylor then went on to explain in detail how millions of gallons of heavy-metal laden water would be released because of the buildup of too much pressure by the EPA plugging the mine. Under this scenario, the EPA would need instant funding to build a treatment plant for the clean up process. Taylor was dead-on.
Just a week after the letter was published, the EPA was onsite attempting to insert a pipe above the mine to help them pump out the toxic water from inside the plugged mind. Yet by admission, they misjudged the pressure and the plug was dislodged sending the yellow/orange sludge into the nearby river systems -- just as Taylor predicted.
Read the entire prediction below in a screenshot via The Gateway Pundit:
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/retired ... onal-money
EPA wanted Superfund Status
Moderators: Pike Ridge Beagles, Aaron Bartlett
-
- Posts: 2144
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:06 pm
- Location: MICHGAN
-
- Posts: 4517
- Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:30 pm
- Location: Rocky Mount, NC
Re: EPA wanted Superfund Status
I wonder how much the EPA is going to be paying in fines to the citizens that are on the coloroda river they contaminated. Toxin in the river, oil in the gulf, 6 of one half dozen of the other.
-
- Posts: 2144
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:06 pm
- Location: MICHGAN
Re: EPA wanted Superfund Status
Yea right !Rabbithoundjb wrote:I wonder how much the EPA is going to be paying in fines to the citizens that are on the coloroda river they contaminated. Toxin in the river, oil in the gulf, 6 of one half dozen of the other.
TheJohnBirchSociety
-
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
- Location: Pineville Ky
Re: EPA wanted Superfund Status
Mental Midgets,,
Hard at work,,you guy's are Brain Dead.
Hard at work,,you guy's are Brain Dead.
If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered
-
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:01 pm
- Location: Pineville Ky
Re: EPA wanted Superfund Status
House GOP Pushes Massive Cuts To EPA, Wildlife And Arts
Since The Repugnant Party was founded they have had one single Goal destroy this country ,,,Millions of Acres along a Rivers and Streams Have been Destroyed because of you guy's,,Just A a Drop in the Bucket compared to How Much of the Ocean and Shores that are Condemned,,,,,You guy's Should be Proud to carry on your Family Traditions.You guy's Disgrace the World of Out Doors men.
House Republicans unveiled legislation Monday that dramatically cuts funding for the Environmental Protection Agency and various arts and wildlife programs.
The legislation (PDF),starting Tuesday, slashes the fiscal 2014 budget for the Interior Department and for the EPA by $5.5 billion from existing levels enacted for 2013 -- a 19 percent cut that brings base funding down to $24.3 billion. It's $4 billion below levels already required by sequestration -- automatic spending cuts that both parties say are senseless and onerous.
House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers (R-KY) said the bill "reflects the extraordinarily hard choices needed to maintain critical investments and services for local communities," while "dramatically scaling back lower-priority, or 'nice-to-have' programs."
The proposal reflects the GOP's opening salvo in what is shaping up to be an ugly battle to keep the government open when funding expires on September 30. Republicans are demanding a swath of new cuts in part to protect the military budget .
Under the GOP's spending bill, the EPA in particular takes a huge blow: its budget is cut by a whopping 34 percent, or $2.8 billion, bringing the new level to $5.5 billion. Other programs that take a hit include the National Park Service (9 percent cut), the Fish and Wildlife Service (27 percent cut) and the U.S. Geological Survey (9 percent cut).
Since The Repugnant Party was founded they have had one single Goal destroy this country ,,,Millions of Acres along a Rivers and Streams Have been Destroyed because of you guy's,,Just A a Drop in the Bucket compared to How Much of the Ocean and Shores that are Condemned,,,,,You guy's Should be Proud to carry on your Family Traditions.You guy's Disgrace the World of Out Doors men.
House Republicans unveiled legislation Monday that dramatically cuts funding for the Environmental Protection Agency and various arts and wildlife programs.
The legislation (PDF),starting Tuesday, slashes the fiscal 2014 budget for the Interior Department and for the EPA by $5.5 billion from existing levels enacted for 2013 -- a 19 percent cut that brings base funding down to $24.3 billion. It's $4 billion below levels already required by sequestration -- automatic spending cuts that both parties say are senseless and onerous.
House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers (R-KY) said the bill "reflects the extraordinarily hard choices needed to maintain critical investments and services for local communities," while "dramatically scaling back lower-priority, or 'nice-to-have' programs."
The proposal reflects the GOP's opening salvo in what is shaping up to be an ugly battle to keep the government open when funding expires on September 30. Republicans are demanding a swath of new cuts in part to protect the military budget .
Under the GOP's spending bill, the EPA in particular takes a huge blow: its budget is cut by a whopping 34 percent, or $2.8 billion, bringing the new level to $5.5 billion. Other programs that take a hit include the National Park Service (9 percent cut), the Fish and Wildlife Service (27 percent cut) and the U.S. Geological Survey (9 percent cut).
If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered
-
- Posts: 4517
- Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:30 pm
- Location: Rocky Mount, NC
Re: EPA wanted Superfund Status
Leftist are oh so quick to point the finger when there opposition has a failure and oh so to point the finger at there opposition when they have a failure, LMAO. PMB you idiot the EPA willingly released these toxins into these waterways, on purpose fool.
-
- Posts: 1275
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 9:58 pm
- Location: greenville pa NW
Re: EPA wanted Superfund Status
Some one please lock this man(pmb) up before he shoots up a theater screaming DIE REPUBLICANS DIE.
COAL HILL KENNELS. LP GR CH Coal Hill's Brush Buster. 2014 PA state champion LP GR CH Coal Hill's Mama Cass. 2010 PA state champion LP R CH GR BCH Coal Hill's Princess Willow HOG DOG POWER!!!!
-
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 6:26 pm
Re: EPA wanted Superfund Status
Obama wanted more money to fight the fires out west. The GOP gave him a budget that would allow federal funding to do so. There are several federal funded agencies that are either too big or not needed so they took them from the EPA, Federal Wildlife Agency, National Park Service, and the National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities programs. Keep in mind that the EPA will still be a huge program. The proposed cut is 9% which amounts of $717 million and still leaves $7.5 BILLION for the biggest thieves in government. The American Indian Health Service gets an increase due to the cuts, but that doesn't matter to Rufus because he hates them too. In developing this budget, cuts to military funding will be avoided. We all know that Rufus hates the USA so he would be all for that, just don't stop his funding.
So this in another example of how liberals lie, smear, and use small parts of the truth to influence the ignorant. Then there are the idiots like Rufus that "eat it up" and spread it like a disease. There is no inquiry into the truth of the matter, only the motivation of acquiring what is not theirs and maintaining their way of life. Which is to take from those that contribute and give it to those that don't. Using the guise of "helping the needy" as a means of acquiring money without earning it.
So this in another example of how liberals lie, smear, and use small parts of the truth to influence the ignorant. Then there are the idiots like Rufus that "eat it up" and spread it like a disease. There is no inquiry into the truth of the matter, only the motivation of acquiring what is not theirs and maintaining their way of life. Which is to take from those that contribute and give it to those that don't. Using the guise of "helping the needy" as a means of acquiring money without earning it.