Army Training Lesson: Hillary is Esample of Insider Threat

[Newt]

Aug 23 2016, 5:45 pm ET
Army Training Lesson Cited Clinton as 'Insider' Threat Risk

by Courtney Kube and Jon Schuppe

An Army training presentation on insider threats included Hillary Clinton among a rogue's gallery of killers and leakers, citing the former secretary of state as an example of "careless or disgruntled employees," NBC News confirmed on Tuesday.

The unclassified slide, which first emerged on a Facebook page that spoofs the military, was confirmed by a U.S. military officials, who said it was used as part of a lesson on how to secure classified materials and improve safety.

A spokesperson from the Army's Training and Doctrine Command said the slide was developed 18 months ago.

"As is common with Army training requirements, the local unit was given latitude to develop their own training products to accomplish the overall training objective," the spokesperson said in a statement.

"This particular presentation had not been reviewed or approved by the unit's leadership, and does not reflect the position of the Army. The training presentation has since been removed."

A U.S. military official told NBC News that the slide — with a header reading "Who is the threat? Insiders" — was used at at Fort Leonard Wood in Missouri. "
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/arm ... sk-n636701


She should be good for something.

[Rabbithoundjb]

She is the perfect example of treason, purgary, elitism, anti-American, democrat leftist politics

[S.R.Patch]

I just read where the army/military has expenditure of over some trillion dollars undocumented, that means "we lost it".

Maybe the Gov. and the Pentagon need more lessons in accounting and accountability... hummm
Oh-well, Taxpayer money for all!

[Newt]

Patch, an honest investigation would start at the Clinton Foundation, Obama's foundation, and countless other politicians of both Parties.
With Valery and Huma making the arrangements, it wouldn't surprise me if Iran got a chunk of it.


Come spy on me:

In an incredibly stupid decision, the U.S. Government has issued a federal bid requiring the installation of security cameras for the U.S Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan. So, what's the problem?

The problem is the cameras, specified as "no substitutions allowed" Hikvision, are built by a company that was founded by a Chinese government research Institute.

Today, the Chinese government is the 'controlling shareholder' of Hikvision.

The company is overseen by a Communist Party Committee and Hikvision has pledged to comply with the Chinese Communist leadership.

Hikvision cameras have a known cybersecurity vulnerability to hacking where both video and audio can be recorded by hostile parties. Even their own Chinese government installations have been easily hacked.

Hikvision has recognized the vulnerability of its cameras, but have only responded by placing a sticker on the camera package stating that Hikvision is not responsible for cameras being hacked.

At IPVM (a professional industry news, training and data gathering site for the security industry) , in an informal poll, members were asked whether the U.S. Government should require Hikvision cameras. Of 401 votes cast, 95% say 'No', with 83% of security professionals saying that the cameras present a security risk for the U.S. Government.

John Kerry and Obama, folks. They want this embassy (and likely more to come) to be easily hacked, and they will be. What other reasoning is there to locking out competition for a known cybersecurity risk?

Unbelievable.

This country is for sale.
How much did Hikvision donate to the democrat party.