LITTLE WORLD

swing · Post by **swing** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:39 pm

Jimmie Abshire won the opens with Junie
Rocky Hill Kennel won the Champs with the Tiger dog ( nice dog ran against it last year)
Paul Prevot won the Grands with R.J.

J,
My dog was running in the opens again, I had him single registered under a different name. ( Thanx NKC for allowing single registry ) LMAO

mac40391 · Post by **mac40391** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:40 pm

kentucky boys lynn perkins 2nd & 3rd in grands, josh long wins the champs, mark and jeff brown got 2nd,sam wells placed his digger 5th i think,brad crouch placed ,jimmy abshire the opens look at my opening post do i know my stuff or not lol ...... good job guys

JMurphy · Post by **JMurphy** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 8:18 pm

swing I am glad that your dog performed well enough to place again.Good luck in your future hunts.

J.Murphy/Murphy's Kennel

swing · Post by **swing** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 8:53 pm

Thanx J,
Its going to be a long row to hoe, but he championed once and I figure he can do it again

, all of my dogs are under a different name now.
Hopefully Joyce won't have to go to giving numbers like she did Turbo powered by Prop and then say he wasnt ever registered NKC she just did that to keep up with her own personal records.

( I will have her books in a total mess)LOL
I am proud there is still registries out there that will still accept money for single registered dogs. LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!

ron simmons · Post by **ron simmons** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 9:12 pm

looks like the ky boys brought home a lot of medal this weekend good job guy congrats to all

PREACHERS KENNEL · Post by **PREACHERS KENNEL** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 9:27 pm

doesnt that make u as underhanded as u say they were not takeing any sides here swing but that seems just wrong to me.!why cant u just let it die?? go trial in something else...

WrongsideRandy · Post by **WrongsideRandy** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 10:09 pm

PREACHERS KENNEL wrote:doesnt that make u as underhanded as u say they were not takeing any sides here swing but that seems just wrong to me.!why cant u just let it die?? go trial in something else...

What's underhanded about that? Swing is correct......NKC is just a pay to play registry. He paid, now he can play. I personally dont know why NKC bans dogs when the dogs have nothing to do with it.........well I do know why they do it, just to try hurting people but the joke is on them. If they only knew ALL THE DOGS that are registered 2 or 3 times in LP and PP as well

LMAO!

There is NO WAY NKC can control this.........

Way to go Swing

Keep giving em hell!

Congrats to all you guys on a good weekend.

swing · Post by **swing** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 10:17 pm

Preacher,
Nothing against you at all, but thats why they do what they do is because people just want to sweep what they have done under the rug and let it go.
I am a little different I guess than some, I cant stand to let people run over people because of who they are.
If people would stand up to them and quit spending their money with them they might get a little more interested in fixing the problem.

Ted Peercy · Post by **Ted Peercy** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 10:30 pm

I don't know if you guys deserved to be banned or not. But if Swing did indeed re-register his dog and enter it, then he is wrong. I doubt the NKC is real worried about re-registers or about people they have banned. If they were, they would just close the registry. If Swing entered his dog, the NKC is $35 richer, for registry and entry fee. Both sides may be laughing here.

PREACHERS KENNEL · Post by **PREACHERS KENNEL** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 10:37 pm

well randy i try to live my life doin the right thing .. i will stand up for what i believe to be right ,, however reregistering dogs in just not right at all...shows poor character ...however after saying all that the nkc is no doubt not perfect and i have heard severla thing i did not like if they were true and myabe they r .. but 2 wrong never make a right... YES swing u have ur right to state ur frustration i wish u the best and hope thing work out for u ...

swing · Post by **swing** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 10:41 pm

don't know if you guys deserved to be banned or not.

Well Ted if you thot something a little underhanded was going on and you posted you smelled fish, would you think that would be worth getting barred over?
With all the other problems NKC has and to bar a guy for smelling fish.
I have seen actual punches throwed at the club and the club president with a black eye over the deal, guess what that guy got 7 years, so go figure.

I doubt the NKC is real worried about re-registers or about people they have banned. If they were, they would just close the registry.

Your exactly right, its all about money.

MasonsBeagles · Post by **MasonsBeagles** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:08 pm

Congrads Jimmy and Junee. Congrads Paul. Congrads Lynn, Lucy and Buzz. That is a good deal.

Lynn and Jimmy keep taking those tips from Redtick. Looks like he is making a proffessional houndsmen out of you yet. Who knows in a week or two with his guidance you two might make a showing at a UKC trial, heck you might even win a PKC trial in both formats wont that be something.....

JMurphy · Post by **JMurphy** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:45 pm

I got an email from someone that thought I was saying it was ok to reregister dogs.I would tell that person ,as I did in my return email,to reread my post to swing.It was worded very carefully and I guess not read as carefully.1st I congratulated him on the fact that his dog performed at a level that made him place at a hunt.2ndly I wished him luck in future hunts.I didnt comment on the ethics of reregistering a dog nor did I specify what type of hunts I was wishing him luck in.Before you make quick judgements realize Swing is one of those people who hates to see the little guy get kicked sand on and delights in aggrevating those who he sees as a bully in a fight .;Without betraying an implied confidence I cant say more.

J.Murphy/Murphy's Kennel

WrongsideRandy · Post by **WrongsideRandy** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:58 pm

If you all want to question character.......lets start by questioning the character of a clown that would ban dogs to try getting even with a person, lmao

Just curious how you all justify Del Morgan trying to ban dogs that have nothing to do with the troubles??

Take care,
Randy

Ted Peercy · Post by **Ted Peercy** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 12:17 am

Sounds pretty stiff to me, Swing. For every action, there is a reaction. I can't say I would not have done the same. But when cooler heads prevail, and I look back, I always hope I haven't done or said something that I would be ashamed of.

The American Beagler Forum

LITTLE WORLD

royl

ugi;'o

..

Before anyone reads something into my post that isnt there.